Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: The effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success

By Dragan Gasevic, Shane Dawson, Tim Rogers, Danijela Gasevic. Internet and Higher Education, 2016

663 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract This study examined the extent to which instructional conditions influence the prediction of academic success in nine undergraduate courses offered in a blended learning model (n = 4134). The study illustrates the differences in predictive power and significant predictors between course-specific models and generalized predictive models. The results suggest that it is imperative for learning analytics research to account for the diverse ways technology is adopted and applied in course-specific contexts. The differences in technology use, especially those related to whether and how learners use the learning management system, require consideration before the log-data can be merged to create a generalized model for predicting academic success. A lack of attention to instructional conditions can lead to an over or under estimation of the effects of LMS features on students' academic success. These findings have broader implications for institutions seeking generalized and portable models for identifying students at risk of academic failure.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b43caf05d86d45401e67a6c502c5dfda16bdc54

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Michail N. Giannakos
  2. Katerina Mangaroska
  3. Lixiang Yan
  4. Dragan Gasevic

In Computer Science Applications

  1. Michail N. Giannakos
  2. Katerina Mangaroska
  3. Chris J. Snijders
  4. Lixiang Yan
  5. Uwe Matzat
  6. Ad Kleingeld
  7. Dragan Gasevic
  8. Rianne Conijn

In Education

  1. Michail N. Giannakos
  2. Katerina Mangaroska
  3. Chris J. Snijders
  4. Lixiang Yan
  5. Uwe Matzat
  6. Ad Kleingeld
  7. Dragan Gasevic
  8. Rianne Conijn

Citations in the corpus