Economic Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility

By Markus Kitzmueller, Jay Shimshack. 2012

1,030 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b09fb40e14b3fd174fe55485b241f68f6793ea2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

1. Patricia Crifo
2. G. Capelle-Blancard
3. Monomita Nandy
4. M. Mulder
5. Arjan Trinks
6. Hariom Manchiraju
7. Diogenis Baboukardos
8. Kyle T. Welch

In Strategy and Management

1. S. Dorobantu
2. Lite J. Nartey
3. Bert Scholtens
4. Luc Renneboog
5. Philipp Krueger
6. Samuel M. Hartzmark
7. Abigail B. Sussman
8. Hao Liang

Citations in the corpus

• Corporate Governance and Green Innovation (2016, neutral): “These considerations motivate expanding interests in the linkages between environmental regulation and industry competitiveness (e.g. Jaffe et al., 1995; Greenstone et al., 2012), and in corporate social responsibility (Reinhardt et al., 2008; Kitzmueller and Shimshack, 2012).”
• Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis: Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance (2017, neutral): “Margolis, Elfenbein, and Walsh (2009) and Kitzmueller and Shimshack (2012) provide surveys of the CSR literature.”
• Strategic environmental corporate social responsibility in a differentiated duopoly market (2015, background): “1 Kitzmueller and Shimshack (2012) offer a thorough survey on the economic perspectives of CSR.”
• Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement (2014, background): “…the focus of the theoretical argument from the costs of ex post managerial discretion to external stakeholders‘ influence over ex ante managerial strategy with respect to members of the value chain (see Laplume Sonpar and Litz, (2008) or Kitzmueller & Shimshack (2011) for a literature review).”
• The valuation relevance of environmental performance revisited: The moderating role of environmental provisions (2017, background): “…with both economic M AN US CR IP T AC CE PT ED benefits (Albertini, 2014; Koh, Qian, & Wang, 2014) and costs (Hassel et al., 2005; Jensen, 2001; Kitzmueller & Shimshack, 2012), and consequently, investors may face difficulties in disentangling these opposite effects of environmental…”
• Socially Responsible Firms (2016, background): “private provision of public goods (Kitzmueller and Shimshack, 2012)—becomes necessary for preserving social welfare.”
• Do Banks Value the Eco-Friendliness of Firms’ in Their Corporate Lending Decision? Some Empirical Evidence (2012, background): “Moreover, most of the Global 250 firms and around 10 percent of S&P firms explain in details their CSR activities to the investors, customers (Kitzmueller & Shimshack, 2012; Kotler & Lee, 2004) and to potential employees (Turban & 4 Greening, 1996) to represent better corporate governance.”