A systematic observation of professional top-level youth soccer coaches.
By C. Cushion, Robyn L. Jones. 2001
155 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2afaa19ede36421a99f43ca805f2d0cda7e5fd41
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- J. Côté
- K. Erickson
- J. Deakin
- Richard Bailey *
- Jennifer Turnnidge
- E. Cope
- Gemma Pearce
- M. Christensen
Citations in the corpus
- “An Eye for Talent”: Talent Identification and the “Practical Sense” of Top-Level Soccer Coaches (2009, background): “This evolving body of research (Cushion, Armour & Jones, 2006; Cushion & Jones, 2001; Jones, Armour, & Potrac, 2003; Jones et al., 2004; Potrac, Jones & Armour, 2002; Potrac, Jones & Cushion, 2007) highlighted the link between coaches’ biographies and their behaviour as an important and complex…”
- Applying transformational leadership theory to coaching research in youth sport: A systematic literature review (2016, methodology): “Similarly, humour has been proposed as an effective method to promote positive relationships and athlete outcomes (e.g. Cushion & Jones, 2001).”
- Why do children take part in, and remain involved in sport? A literature review and discussion of implications for sports coaches (2013, background): “Research into coach’s behaviour using systematic observation has found that, regardless of context, the predominant behaviours used are instructional (e.g. Cushion & Jones, 2001; Lacy & Darst, 1985; Tharp & Gallimore, 1976).”
- Another bad day at the training ground: Coping with ambiguity in the coaching context (2005, background): “A further characteristic of orchestration as manifest in the practice of expert coaches is that of coaching ‘unobtrusively’ (Miller, 1992; Potrac, 2000; Cushion & Jones, 2001).”
- Examining coach-athlete interactions using state space grids: An observational analysis in competitive youth sport (2011, background): “Cushion and Jones (2001) argued that not only is observation necessary for optimal analysis of athlete performance, but also an essential part of feedback sequencing such that any presented information is not “diluted by continuous interaction” (p. 369).”