Urban form and commuting behaviour: a cross‐European perspective

By Tim Schwanen. 2002

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ad1fc196642c65de7497e9a99b77705d5eb915f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

1. G. Santos
2. Thomas Brunn
3. Dimitris Potoglou
4. Hanna Maoh
5. Ralph Buehler
6. Michael Wegener
7. F. Dieleman

In Transportation

1. F. Dieleman
2. G. Santos
3. Thomas Brunn
4. Hannah Behrendt
5. Alexander Teytelboym
6. Dimitris Potoglou
7. Hanna Maoh
8. Ralph Buehler

Citations in the corpus

• Determinants of transport mode choice: a comparison of Germany and the USA (2011, background): “The share of trips by bike declines slightly for the highest density categories in Germany; which might be related to in- creased public transport use in cities (Schwanen, 2002).”
• Factors influencing modal split of commuting journeys in medium-size European cities (2013, methodology): “Dargay and Hanly (2007) find a negative association between higher population density and commuting by car and Schwanen (2002) finds a positive association between population density and commuting by public transport.”
• The impact of metropolitan structure on commute behavior in the Netherlands: a multilevel approach (2004, unknown): “…have found little or no effect of metropolitan size on commute distance or time (Gordon, Kumar, and Richardson 1989b; Levinson and Kumar 1997), there is some evidence that, in Europe, average commute distance or time rises as urban areas become larger (Coombes and Raybould 2001; Schwanen 2002).”
• Part II: Policy instruments for sustainable road transport (2010, background): “Copenhagen’smodeshareof cyclingandwalking isoneof thehighest in Europe at 32per cent (Schwanen, 2002), cyclingalone accounts for 26 per cent (Martens, 2004) and 36 per cent of people cycle to work (Copenhagen City, 2006).”
• COMPACT CITY AND URBAN SPRAWL (2004, background): “…of quality of life and sustainability of metropolitan development; the most frequent outcome studied relates to travel and travel behaviour (for instance Ewing et al., 2002; Srinivasan, 2002; Schwanen, 2002; Dieleman et al., 2002; these studies also review the extensive literature on this topic).”