Multisensory auditory-visual interactions during early sensory processing in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study.

By Sophie Molholm, Walter Ritter, Micah M. Murray, Daniel C. Javitt, Charles E. Schroeder, John J. Foxe. Brain research. Cognitive brain research, 2002

954 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2abe6a773c5171dce1cfbd4ba94b47398058f561

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

What You See Is Not (Always) What You Hear: Induced Gamma Band Responses Reflect Cross-Modal Interactions in Familiar Object Recognition (2007, background): “…interactive effects that cannot be explained by simple summation of activity related to processing of each modality separately (Giard and Peronnet, 1999; Fort et al., 2002; Molholm et al., 2002; Teder- Sälejärvi et al., 2002; Talsma and Woldorff, 2005) (for review, see Schroeder and Foxe, 2005).”
The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. (2007, background): “For possible neural mechanisms of multisensory convergence during the early cortical processing, see Foxe and Schroeder (2005; see also Besle et al. 2005; Molholm et al. 2002; Giard and Peronnet 1999; Bernstein et al., 2002).”
The multisensory function of the human primary visual cortex. (2016, background): “…onsetting 40–55 ms and visible as a parieto-occipital positivity in the difference map at the scalp (Fort et al., 2002a; Giard and Peronnet, 1999; Molholm et al., 2002; Vidal et al., 2008; Senkowski et al., 2011; Stekelenburg and Vroomen, 2012; Cappe et al., 2012; Altieri et al., 2015; see also…”
Sound-Induced Enhancement of Low-Intensity Vision: Multisensory Influences on Human Sensory-Specific Cortices and Thalamic Bodies Relate to Perceptual Enhancement of Visual Detection Sensitivity (2010, background): “This might potentially arise because of feedback influences (see below) and/or through feedforward thalamic interactions that may guide some of the earlier audiovisual interaction effects (cf. Giard and Peronnet, 1999; Molholm et al., 2002; Brosch et al., 2005).”
Looming Signals Reveal Synergistic Principles of Multisensory Integration (2012, background): “The overall timing of our effects generally concurs with prior studies using stationary stimuli that were taskrelevant, task-irrelevant (but nonetheless attended) or passively presented (Giard and Peronnet, 1999; Molholm et al., 2002; Vidal et al., 2008; Cappe et al., 2010; Raij et al., 2010).”
The Curious Incident of Attention in Multisensory Integration: Bottom-up vs. Top-down (2016, neutral): “, 2000; Fairhall and Macaluso, 2009), increased physiological signals from brain areas responding to these stimuli (Molholm et al., 2002) or greater selectivity of relevant stimulus material (Staufenbiel et al.”
Selective Attention and Multisensory Integration: Multiple Phases of Effects on the Evoked Brain Activity (2005, methodology): “The observed scalp distributions of these effects are similar with those of the later multisensory integration effects described by previous studies (Fort et al., 2002b; Molholm et al., 2002; TederSälejärvi et al., 2002; Giard & Peronnet, 1999).”
Do early sensory cortices integrate cross-modal information? (2007, background): “Similar observations were made for a range of combinations of the different modalities (Giard and Peronnet 1999; Fort et al. 2002a, 2002b; Molholm et al. 2002), and in addition, EEG studies suggested neuronal correlates of well known multisensory illusions over classical auditory areas; e.”
Multisensory convergence in calcarine visual areas in macaque monkey. (2003, background): “The direct connections might contribute especially to the post-stimulus short latency early responses reported by recent ERP studies in humans(Foxe and Simpson, 2001; Fort et al., 2002; Molholm et al., 2002).”
Multisensory visual-auditory object recognition in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study. (2004, background): “The same argument could well be made for our previous study (Molholm et al., 2002) and the one by Giard and Peronnet (1999) where multisensory N1 effects were also found and again, where there was no ‘natural’ relationship between the visual and auditory elements.”
The role of multisensory memories in unisensory object discrimination. (2005, background): “, visual flashes, auditory beeps, and somatosensory pulses), often during conditions of passive presentation or simple detection [7,8,15,18].”
Semantic congruence is a critical factor in multisensory behavioral performance (2004, result): “…present study were faster than the responses predicted by the race model, a finding consistent with studies evaluating spatial and temporal congruence (Hughes et al. 1994; Forster et al. 2002; Molholm et al. 2002) and which strongly suggest an interaction between the visual and auditory channels.”
Multisensory Interaction in Saccadic Reaction Time: A Time-Window-of-Integration Model (2004, neutral): “In fact, there is increasing evidence that multisensory processing does not take place entirely in feedforward convergent pathways but that it can also modulate early cortical unisensory processing, as suggested by recent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and ERP studies (see Laurienti et”