Selective Attention and Multisensory Integration: Multiple Phases of Effects on the Evoked Brain Activity

By Durk Talsma, Marty G. Woldorff. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2005

433 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sensory Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ff17fa5b46da57efb86920166ec6c554bb61481e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Sensory Systems

Citations in the corpus

Modality-specific selective attention attenuates multisensory integration (2007, background): “Although there is substantial evidence that attention can modulate the processing of information within individual sensory systems, limited data exist on how attention may impact the integration of information across sensory systems (Bertelson and Radeau 1981; Bertelson et al. 2000; Vroomen et al. 2”
Top-down control and early multisensory processes: chicken vs. egg (2015, background): “OPINION ARTICLE published: 03 March 2015 doi: 10.3389/fnint.2015.00017 Top-down control and early multisensory processes: chicken vs. egg”
The Curious Incident of Attention in Multisensory Integration: Bottom-up vs. Top-down (2016, neutral): “, saliency effects) were influenced by modality-specific (or spatial) attention already at 100 ms poststimulus (Talsma and Woldorff, 2005; Talsma et al., 2007).”
Multisensory Interplay Reveals Crossmodal Influences on ‘Sensory-Specific’ Brain Regions, Neural Responses, and Judgments (2008, neutral): “Talsma and Woldorff (2005) also used an audiovisual spatial attention task and reported a positivity starting 100 ms after stimulus onset, for audiovisual stimuli relative to the sum of unisensory stimuli.”
Identifying and Quantifying Multisensory Integration: A Tutorial Review (2014, background): “…Stevenson and Wallace 2013; Stevenson et al. 2012c; Hairston et al. 2005; Powers et al. 2009; 2012; Stevenson et al. 2013; Dixon and Spitz 1980; Vroomen and Keetels 2010; Conrey and Pisoni 2006; van Wassenhove et al. 2007)—the span of SOAs within which the illusion is highly likely to take place.”
Selective attention and audiovisual integration: is attending to both modalities a prerequisite for early integration? (2006, background): “All participants had normal or corrected-to-normal vision and normal hearing capabilities.”
Attentional Resource Allocation in Visuotactile Processing Depends on the Task, But Optimal Visuotactile Integration Does Not Depend on Attentional Resources (2016, result): “The view that multisensory integration is an automatic process has been challenged by several studies (Alsius et al., 2005, 2007, 2014; Talsma and Woldorff, 2005; Talsma et al., 2007; Mozolic et al., 2008; Van der Burg et al., 2008; Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience | www.frontiersin.org 2…”
What You See Is Not (Always) What You Hear: Induced Gamma Band Responses Reflect Cross-Modal Interactions in Familiar Object Recognition (2007, background): “…interactive effects that cannot be explained by simple summation of activity related to processing of each modality separately (Giard and Peronnet, 1999; Fort et al., 2002; Molholm et al., 2002; Teder- Sälejärvi et al., 2002; Talsma and Woldorff, 2005) (for review, see Schroeder and Foxe, 2005).”
The COGs (context, object, and goals) in multisensory processing (2016, background): “In other studies, the eMSI were reported in response to multisensory stimuli appearing in irrelevant locations or moments in time (Talsma and Woldorff 2005; van der Burg et al. 2011).”
Spatial attention can modulate audiovisual integration at multiple cortical and subcortical sites (2009, methodology): “paired vs. unpaired gratings and tones; Talsma & Woldorff, 2005 ).”