Foreground:background salience: Explaining the effects of graphical displays on risk avoidance
By Eric R. Stone, Winston R. Sieck, Benita E. Bull, J. Yates, S. C. Parks, Carolyn J. Rush. 2003
172 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, General Decision Sciences, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2a037ebb715ac2f39269e8ce68a4659730047ccd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
In General Decision Sciences
- Norbert Schwarz
- Isaac Lipkus
- David J. Spiegelhalter
- Ellen Peters
- Adam J. Berinsky
- Jonathan Evans
- Daniel Kahneman
- Nidhi Agrawal
In Social Psychology
- Norbert Schwarz
- Bertram Gawronski
- D. Oyserman
- Joar Vittersø
- D. Barnes-Holmes
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Gregory Walton
- J. de Houwer
Citations in the corpus
- How and Why 1 Year Differs from 365 Days: A Conversational Logic Analysis of Inferences from the Granularity of Quantitative Expressions (2012, background): “One account of numerosity effects holds that people focus on the numbers and ignore the units in which they are expressed (Stone et al. 2003). Testing this possibility, Pandelaere and colleagues (2011) drew some participants’ attention to the fact that the same quantity can be expressed in different”
- Numeric, Verbal, and Visual Formats of Conveying Health Risks: Suggested Best Practices and Future Recommendations (2007, background): “The resulting impression of risk is likely to be influenced by what information is being emphasized.(59,60) Related to the above, expression of mathematically equivalent ratios may result in varying perceptions of risk.”
- Risk and Uncertainty Communication (2017, background): “Showing only adverse events can lead to risk-aversion because of their foreground salience (Stone et al. 2003), and so to avoid these framing effects one would ideally show the part-to-whole comparison of both the positive and negative www.annualreviews.org • Risk and Uncertainty Communication 39 A…”