LSA as a Theory of Meaning
By T. Landauer. 2007
190 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Human Factors and Ergonomics, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29e36a7fbf97ffd943df897139c4f75caa631083
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Human Factors and Ergonomics
- B. Shuck
- Danielle S. McNamara
- Brenden M. Lake
- Gregory L. Murphy
- Scott Andrew Crossley
- Kim F. Nimon
- Tom Salsbury
- Drea Zigarmi
In Sociology and Political Science
- B. Shuck
- Danielle S. McNamara
- Brenden M. Lake
- Gregory L. Murphy
- Scott Andrew Crossley
- Kim F. Nimon
- Tom Salsbury
- Drea Zigarmi
Citations in the corpus
- Construct Overlap Between Employee Engagement and Job Satisfaction: A Function of Semantic Equivalence? (2015, background): “Semantic similarity can also be represented via cosines, where vectors are ordered in the same manner as correlations and range between -1 and 1 (Landauer 2011).”
- Word meaning in minds and machines (2020, methodology): “LSA is also of interest because some of its proponents speci fi cally argued that it is a model of human knowledge or word meaning (Landauer, 2007), and models using similar techniques continue to be tested against human psychological data (e.g., Mandera et al., 2017).”
- Psycholinguistic word information in second language oral discourse (2011, methodology): “Recent examples include Crossley et al. (2009) who investigated L2 conceptual development using WordNet (Miller et al., 1990), Crossley et al. (2010a) who investigated the growth of semantic co-referentiality using Latent Semantic Analysis (Landauer, 2007), and Crossley et al. (2010b) who investigat”