Determinants of private car users' acceptance of road pricing

By Cecilia Jakobsson, Satoshi Fujii, Tommy Gärling. 2000

343 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/294fb4fccbbf2a35f807f7acc9d6b836049ad99c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Transportation

Citations in the corpus

Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm (2010, background): “Also, respondents hardly reported (intentions to) reduce their own car use, which are often people who find road pricing schemes unacceptable (Jakobsson et al., 2000).”
The acceptability of efficiency-enhancing environmental taxes, subsidies and regulation: An experimental investigation (2012, background): “when the instrument is viewed as coercive (Attari et al., 2009; Baron and Jurney, 1993; Jakobsson et al., 2000; Steg et al., 2006).”
A multi-level analysis of sustainable mobility transitions: Niche development in the UK and Sweden (2008, background): “It has also been shown that public acceptance of road pricing among car owners in Sweden decreases if it is perceived as limiting freedom [43].”
Public attitudes towards policy measures for reducing private car use: evidence from a study in Sweden (2005, background): “There are several examples of such applications of attitude theory that have been successful in increasing the understanding of public acceptance or of acceptability of road pricing (e.g., Bamberg and Rölle, 2003; Jakobsson et al., 2000; Schade and Schlag, 2003).”
Explaining Variations in Public Acceptability of Road Pricing Schemes (2005, background): “Other attitudinal aspects of acceptability relate to perceptions of freedom and fairness (Baron, 1995; Jones, 1998; Jakobsson et al., 2000; Golob, 2001; PATS Consortium, 2001) and concerns over equity issues (Giuliano, 1992, 1994; Langmyhr, 1997; Teubel, 1997; Hårsman, 2001).”
The role of perceived effectiveness of policy measures in predicting recycling behaviour in Hong Kong (2014, background): “In a review of pro-environmental behaviour by Steg and Vlek (2009), perceived effectiveness and acceptability of policy measures were examined in terms of transport (e.g. Jakobsson et al., 2000) and energy (e.g. Steg et al., 2005).”
Promoting household energy conservation (2008, background): “Other important factors increasing the acceptability of energy policies are their perceived fairness and the extent to which these policies are expected to actually reduce energy problems (Bamberg and Rölle, 2003; Jakobsson et al., 2000; Rienstra et al., 1999; Schuitema and Steg, 2005a).”
Travel Demand Management Targeting Reduced Private Car Use: Effectiveness, Public Acceptability and Political Feasibility (2007, background): “Research has demonstrated a positive relation between perceived fairness and acceptability (e.g., Bamberg & Rölle, 2003; Jakobsson et al., 2000; Jones, 2003).”
Managing passenger behavioral intention: an integrated framework for service quality, satisfaction, perceived value, and switching barriers (2011, background): “Although some transportation researchers have done in this manner (e.g., Jakobsson et al. 2000; Jen and Hu 2003; Lin et al. 2008; Park et al. 2006), their studies contain one or two of the major theories.”
Acceptability of travel demand management measures: The importance of problem awareness, personal norm, freedom, and fairness (2006, background): “More specifically, this study confirms the importance of perceived fairness for the acceptability of TDM measures identified in earlier studies (e.g. Jakobsson et al., 2000; Joireman et al., 2001).”