Objective age-of-acquisition (AoA) norms for a set of 230 object names in French: Relationships with psycholinguistic variables, the English data from Morrison et al. (1997), and naming latencies

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Short article: The effects of age of acquisition and frequency trajectory on object naming: Comments on Pérez (2007) (2009, unknown): “We think that it is risky to rely on the variance accounted for by objective AoA to argue that the order of acquisition is one the strongest determinants of picture naming latencies (a strong claim made some years ago by Chalard et al., 2003, for instance).”
The influence of age of acquisition in word reading and other tasks : A never ending story ? (2004, methodology): “AoA ratings were taken from Alario and Ferrand (1999) and the objective AoA measures were taken from Chalard et al. (2003).”
Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. (2005, background): “Bonin, Chalard et al. (2001) V French 36 237 Significant Significant Significant L Fam, IV, BF, N, GPC Fiebach et al. (2003) V German 12 136 Significant Significant Fiebach et al.”
Computational Evidence That Frequency Trajectory Theory Does Not Oppose But Emerges From Age-of-Acquisition Theory (2012, unknown): “…the behavioral results are controversial given that some of them indicate an interaction between AoA and cumulative frequency (Barry et al., 1997; Ellis & Lambon Ralph, 2000; Lambon Ralph & Ehsan, 2006), where others do not (Chalard et al., 2003; Cuetos et al., 2006; Meschyan & Hernan-dez, 2002).”
Age of acquisition and lexical processing (2006, methodology): “A similar procedure was used by Chalard et al. (2003) for French words.”