A multi‐theoretic perspective on trust and power in strategic supply chains

By R. Duane Ireland, Justin W. Webb. 2007

720 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/28d19370a2ae8621f300d863c15e85b970520580

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The relative impact of attribute, severity, and timing of psychological contract breach on behavioral and attitudinal outcomes (2013, background): “…notion of vulnerability to another’s actions, which are beyond control of the trusting person, is a common theme in the literature on trust (Deutsch, 1958; Rotter, 1967; Zand, 1972), and in supply chain contexts examining trust (Gattiker et al., 2007; Ireland and Webb, 2007; Zhang et al., 2011).”
Supply chain integration and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis of positional advantage mediation and moderating factors (2016, background): “…Disney, Holmstrӧm, & Småros, 2005), operational integration that focuses on the collaborative joint activities and work processes among firms (e.g., Ireland & Webb, 2007; Saeed, Malhotra, & Grover, 2005), and relational integration that emphasizes a strong connection between firms in the supply…”
Process Innovation: Open Innovation and the Moderating Role of the Motivation to Achieve Legitimacy (2018, background): “29 can force an organization to implement different practices (Ireland and Webb, 2007).”
Combining Psychology and Economics in the Analysis of Compliance: From Enforcement to Cooperation (2012, background): “Further, just as power can undermine trust, trust can make measures directed at enforcing rule compliance unnecessary, thus making the exertion of power redundant (Costa, Roe, and Taillieu, 2001; Currall and Judge, 1995; Dekker, 2004; Gulati, 1995; Inkpen and Currall, 2004; Ireland and Webb, 2007).”
The effects of trust and coercive power on supplier integration (2009, background): “From this perspective, RDT omits the role of trust in the inter-organizational relationship, and linkages among organizations are instead viewed as power relations (Ireland and Webb, 2007).”
On Theory in Supply Chain Uncertainty and its Implications for Supply Chain Integration (2016, positive): “However, because each supply chain member is an independent firm that acts in its own interests (Ireland & Webb, 2007; Hult, et al, 2007), it is differentiated from other members, which are inherently dissimilar in structure, internal culture, resources and motivation for supply chain membership…”
A Cross-Disciplinary Exploration of Entrepreneurship Research (2007, background): “…versus a flexible network (Choi & Krause, 2006), the need to maintain a balance of trust and power to facilitate long-term entrepreneurial efforts in strategic supply chains (Ireland & Webb, 2007a), and compatibility issues among partners during the innovation process (Singhal & Singhal, 2002).”