Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization
By Raymond F. Zammuto, Terri L. Griffith, Ann Majchrzak, Deborah J. Dougherty, Samer Faraj. Organ. Sci., 2007
1,163 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/27c910d69a6c974ff2c3030fe8e217ce9fa11fc9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Paul M. Leonardi
- Youngjin Yoo
- Samer Faraj
- Nicole B. Ellison
- G. Schryen
- Susan V. Scott
- Jennifer L. Gibbs
- Matthew S. Weber
In Sociology and Political Science
- Paul M. Leonardi
- Jennifer L. Gibbs
- Nicole B. Ellison
- Ann Majchrzak
- Paul A. Pavlou
- Kalle J. Lyytinen
- Stefan Seidel
- Matthew S. Weber
In Strategy and Management
- Paul M. Leonardi
- G. Schryen
- Stefan Seidel
- Vinit Parida
- Joakim Wincent
- Ann Majchrzak
- Paul A. Pavlou
- Shirley Gregor
Citations in the corpus
- Materiality and change: Challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing (2008, background): “The materiality of information technology remains grossly under-theorized (Orlikowski & Iacono, 2001; Zamutto, Griffith, Majchrzak, Dougherty, & Faraj, 2007 ), in large part, because conflating materialism with determinism poses subsidiary challenges that make it difficult to tease apart the role o”
- Revisiting IS business value research: what we already know, what we still need to know, and how we can get there (2013, methodology): “…between IS innovation and socio-organisational capabilities is stressed in many of the abovementioned works, which suggest a symbiotic relationship (Zammuto et al , 2007), while others, such as Avgerou (2000), adopt an institutionalisation perspective and argue that IS innovation relies on its own…”
- The Contradictory Influence of Social Media Affordances on Online Communal Knowledge Sharing (2013, positive): “The term has also been used as a way to explore use possibilities afforded by the design of a new technology (Markus & Silver, 2008) as well as ways to refer to interactions of features and organizational context to produce generic affordances (e.g., Treem & Leonardi, 2012; Zammuto et al., 2007).”
- Blockchain Governance—A New Way of Organizing Collaborations? (2020, background): “In particular, IT can spawn organizational forms that are more fl exible and less hierarchical (Zammuto et al. 2007) and can fundamentally structure collab-orations (Grif fi th et al. 2003); thus, it has important socialimplicationsfor organizing transactions (Lyytinen and Damsgaard 2011, Wirtz et…”
- Artificial intelligence, robotics, advanced technologies and human resource management: a systematic review (2021, background): “Zammuto et al. (2007) describe five affordances – visualizing entire work processes, real-time/flexible product and service innovation, virtual collaboration, mass collaboration, and simulation/synthetic reality – that can result from this interplay.”
- When Does Technology Use Enable Network Change in Organizations? A Comparative Study of Feature Use and Shared Affordances (2013, background): “In this way, affordances are relational (Hutchby 2001; Zammuto et al. 2007).”
- What Happens When Evaluation Goes Online? Exploring Apparatuses of Valuation in the Travel Sector (2014, background): “, Huber, 1990; Tushman and Anderson, 1986) or on cultural aspects, as in studies of the social shaping of technology or the affordances of use (e.g., Barley, 1986; Garud and Rappa, 1994; Leonardi 2011; Zammuto et al., 2007).”