Event-sampling and other methods for studying everyday experience.

By H. T. Reis, Shelly L. Gable. 2000

576 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/27beca24c2d26b29d8e291b4469a315c81ec1545

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Scientific Contributions of Within-Person Research in Management: Making the Juice Worth the Squeeze (2018, methodology): “…ecological momentary assessment (Beal & Weiss, 2003), event sampling (Elfering et al., 2005), diary studies (Heller & Watson, 2005), the daily diary method (Ferris, Spence, Brown, & Heller, 2012), everyday experience methods (Reis & Gable, 2000), or the experience sampling method (ESM; Beal, 2015).”
The emotional sequelae of nonmarital relationship dissolution: Analysis of change and intraindividual variability over time. (2005, unknown): “…and patterning of mental processes in everyday life situations through random signaling (Bolger, Davis, & Rafaeli, 2003; Bolger & Eckenrode, 1995; Csikszentmihalyi & Larson, 1992; Marco, Neale, Schwartz, Shiffman, & Stone, 1999; Reis & Gable, 2000; Tennen, Affleck, Amerli, & Carney, 2000).”
Lab And/Or Field? Measuring Personality Processes and Their Social Consequences (2015, background): “Third, repeated daily life assessments uniquely allow studying the prevalence and unfolding of phenomena over time (Bolger et al., 2003; Conner & Mehl, in press; Reis & Gable, 2000).”
The functions of music for affect regulation (2011, methodology): “The event-contingent method is capable of generating the types of reports that are required in the studies described here (Reis & Gable, 2000).”
Methods of Ecological Momentary Assessment in Organizational Research (2003, background): “We have highlighted a few of the key concerns, and other concerns have been detailed elsewhere (e.g., Reis & Gable, 2000).”
A Procedure for Evaluating Sensitivity to Within-Person Change: Can Mood Measures in Diary Studies Detect Change Reliably? (2006, methodology): “…daily mood; within-person change; reliability; Generalizability Theory Daily diary designs are increasingly recommended for studying dynamic psychological processes such as emotional states, self-regulation, and appraisals of social situations (Bolger, Davis, & Rafaeli, 2003; Reis & Gable, 2000).”
Neural pathways link social support to attenuated neuroendocrine stress responses (2007, methodology): “Similar techniques have been validated and used widely (Reis and Gable, 2002).”
Experience Sampling: Promises and Pitfalls, Strengths and Weaknesses (2003, methodology): “Types of Experience Sampling Under the broad umbrella of experience sampling methods, three distinct types of experience sampling exist (Reis and Gable, 2000; Wheeler and Reis, 1991).”
Ostracism in everyday life. (2012, methodology): “Studies that use intensive repeated measures methods provide numerous advantages over studies that rely on single assessments that may require retrospection over an extended period of time (e.g., Reis & Gable, 2000).”
Be smart, play dumb? A transactional perspective on day-specific knowledge hiding, interpersonal conflict, and psychological strain (2021, methodology): “Here, an event-based approach (e.g., Connelly et al., 2012, Study 1), which is especially suited to study incidents with a low occurrence rate (Reis and Gable, 2000), might allow for more accurate insights into the social dynamics of daily knowledge hiding.”
Habits in everyday life: thought, emotion, and action. (2002, background): “Consistent with Rozin’s (2001) call for more descriptive research in social psychology, we evaluate habits as they are naturally “situated in the structure of social life” (p.”
Doing the right thing: Measuring wellbeing for public policy (2011, background): “A typical ESM study lasts one to two weeks, with individuals responding to around two to twelve signals per week (Fleeson, 2007; Reis & Gable, 2000).”