Coping with stigma and prejudice.

By Carol T. Miller, B. Major. 2000

399 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2770fc522a4eaac4b6ad4675aea1dd914c8bdfc4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The psychological implications of concealing a stigma: a cognitive-affective-behavioral model. (2007, background): “It is important to make such reattributions only in situations in which this is appropriate and only in the presence of clear situational cues that negative outcomes are a likely result of stigma-related difficulties (Miller & Major, 2000).”
A Theoretical Perspective on Coping with Stigma. (2001, background): “Compared to other types of stressors, stigma may be especially stressful because it poses some unique demands on the individual (Miller & Major, 2000).”
A Stress and Coping Perspective on Confronting Sexism (2004, background): “Our approach to understanding this question follows from our assumption that confronting discrimination is one way of coping with a stressful situation (Miller & Kaiser, 2001; Miller & Major, 2000).”
Multiple minorities as multiply marginalized: Applying the minority stress theory to LGBTQ people of color (2017, background): “(Branscombe, Schmitt, & Harvey, 1999; Crocker & Major, 1989; Miller & Major, 2000) Intuitively, it seems logical that, in addition to being a sexual or gender minority, having aminority racial/ethnic backgroundwould lead toworse health outcomes, as the stress of being a minority in multiple…”
The social psychology of stigma. (2005, background): “Coping in Response to Threats to the Self People cope with stigma-induced identity threat in a variety of ways (see, e.g., Allport 1954, Miller & Kaiser 2001, Miller & Major 2000, Swim & Thomas A nn u.”
Stigma Management Communication: A Theory and Agenda for Applied Research on How Individuals Manage Moments of Stigmatized Identity (2010, background): “When considering stigma message effects on the ‘‘marked’’ individuals, Smith (2007a) noted that stigmatized individuals isolate themselves, may try to compensate, avoid uncomfortable stigmatizing situations, and make favorable social comparisons (see Miller & Major, 2000).”
Stigma and business failure: implications for entrepreneurs’ career choices (2014, background): “The typologies proposed by Oliver (1991) and by Miller and Major (2000) provide perspectives that highlight the pressures of formal and informal institutions within a country on two dimensional levels.”
Employment Discrimination in Organizations: Antecedents and Consequences (2006, background): “Research suggests that people who assert that they have been discriminated against frequently experience social rejection and interpersonal problems (Miller & Major, 2000).”
Perceiving Discrimination Against One’s Gender Group has Different Implications for Well-Being in Women and Men (2002, methodology): “Second, incorporating group identification into our model adds to a growing literature on the ways in which disadvantaged groups cope with the psychological costs of perceiving discrimination against them (e.g., Clark et al., 1999; Miller & Major, 2000).”
The Psychological Impact of Prejudice: Implications for Intergroup Contact (2003, background): “Recognizing the possibility that one may become the target of prejudice and discrimination can contribute to greater stress and anxiety in intergroup contexts (Miller & Major, 2000).”
The Contribution of the Lay Theories Approach to the Study of Groups (2001, background): “Interestingly, like the lay theories approach, this work emphasizes the active role that the stigmatized individuals play in creating meaning systems and devising coping strategies to deal with prejudice and stigma-related stress (e.g., C. T. Miller & Major, 2000; see also Crocker et al., 1998).”