Institutional complementarity between corporate governance and Corporate Social Responsibility: a comparative institutional analysis of three capitalisms

By N. Kang, J. Moon. 2012

279 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/276e288d268012321c48ed2ead5f6fed16a66f09

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Ruth V. Aguilera
2. William Q. Judge
3. Gregory Jackson
4. Dirk Matten
5. Stav Fainshmidt
6. J. Lee Brown III
7. Daniel P. Kinderman
8. Adam Smith

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Ruth V. Aguilera
2. Gregory Jackson
3. William Q. Judge
4. Dirk Matten
5. Daniel P. Kinderman
6. Stav Fainshmidt
7. J. Lee Brown III
8. Stephen Brammer

In Strategy and Management

1. Ruth V. Aguilera
2. Daniel P. Kinderman
3. Dirk Matten
4. William Q. Judge
5. Stav Fainshmidt
6. J. Lee Brown III
7. Adam Smith
8. Gregory Jackson

Citations in the corpus

• Corporate Social Responsibility and Institutional Theory: New Perspectives on Private Governance (2012, background): “In furthering the debate on these issues, Kang and Moon (2012) offer a theoretical framework for examining how national institutions associated with Corporate Social Responsibility and institutional theory 13 different 'varieties' of capitalism influence CSR, as well as investigating the nature of…”
• Mapping the business systems of 61 major economies: A taxonomy and implications for varieties of capitalism and business systems research (2018, unknown): “…2004; Akkermans et al., 2009; Allen, 2013; Keller and Block, 2013; Boschma and Capone, 2015), CSR (Matten and Moon, 2008; Gjølberg, 2009; Jackson and Apostolakou, 2010; Brammer et al., 2012; Kang and Moon, 2012) and inequality (Rueda and Pontusson, 2000; Schneider and Makszin, 2014; Thelen, 2014).”
• The Social Responsibility of International Business: From Ethics and the Environment to CSR and Sustainable Development (2016, unknown): “…corporate governance approaches.2 Although the different concepts continue to coexist, a certain convergence can be seen, looking at contents of the discussion, the terminology used and the tendency to cover the whole range of issues (e.g. Devinney, Schwalbach, & Williams, 2013; Kang & Moon, 2012).”
• Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries as an Emerging Field of Study (2018, unknown): “A second framework also more applicable to more clearly demarcated varieties of capitalist formations comes through the work of Kang and Moon (2012).”
• Which model of capitalism best delivers both wealth and equality? (2014, background): “And with the recent rise of the developing economies eager to catch up economically to the developed economies, state-led market economies have entered the fray (Kang & Moon, 2012).”
• Varieties of institutional systems: A contextual taxonomy of understudied countries (2016, background): “Second, the state may also indirectly intervene in the economy through capital provision, favoritism, and/or participation in corporate governance (e.g., political appointments to upper echelons) (Boyer, 2005; Kang & Moon, 2012; Musacchio & Lazzarini, 2014).”
• ‘Free Us Up So We Can Be Responsible!’ The Co-Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility and Neo-Liberalism in the UK, 1977-2010 (2012, background): “CSR has partially compensated for the market’s deficits in the areas of legitimacy and social needs, but it reinforces neo-liberal institutions and focus on shareholder value by maintaining a similar logic based on market voluntarism (Kang and Moon, 2012).”