NOTES AND COMMENTS GIVING ACCORDING TO GARP: AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF THE CONSISTENCY OF PREFERENCES FOR ALTRUISM

By James Andreoni, John H. Miller. 2002

1,312 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2673660257599d0b488b7cd88f1e490b22c7380d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In General Decision Sciences

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

The 1/d Law of Giving (2010, background): “Leider, Mobius, Quoc-Anh, and Rosenblat (2007) study several versions of the dictator game in which they vary the amount received by the recipient when the dictator gives up part of the pie (see Andreoni and Miller, 2002).”
Testing theories of fairness - Intentions matter (2008, background): “Andreoni and Miller (2002) , Bolle and Kritikos (2001), Charness and Rabin (2002) and Engelmann and Strobel (2004) report results suggesting the presence of a non-negligible fraction of subjects willing to increase efficiency.”
The Evolution of Strong Reciprocity: Cooperation in Heterogeneous Populations (2004, background): “, 2003) and modern market based societies (Loewenstein et al., 1989; Andreoni and Miller, 2002).”
Chapter 8 The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism – Experimental Evidence and New Theories (2006, methodology): “With the exemption of Andreoni and Miller (2002) this has not yet been done.”
Experimenter demand effects in economic experiments (2010, neutral): “3, among others Ball et al.’s ‘status in markets’ experiment (Example 1), instructions on how to play the best guessing game (Example 2), behavior in dictator games (Examples 3 and 6), within subjects manipulations potentially inducing EDE aligned with the true experimental objectives as in Andreon”
Warm glow, information, and inefficient charitable giving (2011, methodology): “12This is similar to the rate of violations in Andreoni and Miller (2002) but much lower than the rate of violations in Fisman et al. (2007), likely because the former paper observed choices under 8-11 budget sets whereas the latter observed choices under 50 di erent budget sets.”
The dynamics of responder behavior in ultimatum games: a meta-study (2011, methodology): “Andreoni et al. (2004) were interested in seeing if they could predict behavior in standard ultimatum games using preferences fit from data in a convex ultimatum game.”
Is the Welfare State Sustainable? Experimental Evidence on Citizens' Preferences for Redistribution (2010, neutral): “One is by Andreoni and Miller (2002), who test the consistency of altruistic revealed preferences in a dictatorship experiment, varying an implicit price.”