The dynamics of responder behavior in ultimatum games: a meta-study

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

More than Thirty Years of Ultimatum Bargaining Experiments: Motives, Variations, and a Survey of the Recent Literature (2013, unknown): “Recently, Cooper and Dutcher (2011) provide evidence in a meta-study (see also Lin and Sunder, 2002) that behavior in repeated ultimatum games with stranger interaction seems similar to learning a norm, where offers have to hit some threshold to be accepted.”
Wholesale Pricing under Mild and Privately Known Concerns for Fairness (2014, methodology): “We refer the reader to Guth and Tietz (1990), Roth and Erev (1995), Camerer (2003), Cooper and Kagel (2007), and Cooper and Dutcher (2011), for comprehensive reviews of this literature.”
Money, depletion, and prosociality in the dictator game (2015, background): “The economics literature has observed an analogous effect in repeated UGs, and the working hypothesis (Cooper & Dutcher, 2011) is that responders learn to accept unfair offers and proposers in turn learn this fact and react by lowering their offers.”