The Evolution of Strong Reciprocity: Cooperation in Heterogeneous Populations

By Samuel Bowles, Herbert Gintis. 2004

272 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e9616a88e12d2c69d1884756583a1171425bab7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Emma Cohen
2. J. Park
3. Paul J. Zak
4. V. Morhenn
5. Elizabeth S. Piper

In Safety Research

1. Emma Cohen
2. J. Park
3. Paul J. Zak
4. V. Morhenn
5. Elizabeth S. Piper

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Emma Cohen
2. J. Park
3. Paul J. Zak
4. V. Morhenn
5. Elizabeth S. Piper
6. Christian Bjørnskov
7. Sjoerd Beugelsdijk
8. Jonathan R.W. Temple

Citations in the corpus

• Altruism towards strangers in need: costly signaling in an industrial society (2010, unknown): “…explaining generous acts towards non-kin: indirect reciprocity (Alexander, 1987; Milinski, Semmann, Bakker, & Krambeck, 2001), strong reciprocity (Bowles & Gintis, 2004; Fehr, Fischbacher, & Gachter, 2002), reputation-building (Bereczkei, Birkas, & Kerekes, 2007; Milinski, Semmann, & Krambeck,…”
• Monetary sacrifice among strangers is mediated by endogenous oxytocin release after physical contact (2008, background): “Keywords: Cooperation; Altruism; Sacrifice; Trust; Touch”
• The Evolution of Tag-Based Cooperation in Humans (2012, background): “Where groups are sufficiently large as to render average genetic relatedness extremely low, it is argued that cooperation in such interactions cannot be explained in terms of inclusive fitness benefits (Bowles and Gintis 2004:18).”