Testing theories of fairness - Intentions matter

By Armin Falk, Ernst Fehr, Urs Fischbacher. Games Econ. Behav., 2008

773 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a7b3a6788e74adfe7c860c1997d3b61401eb8ace

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

In Economics and Econometrics

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

The behavioural economics of climate change (2008, background): “matter too (Dufwenberg and Kirchsteiger, 2004; Falk et al., 2008 ).”
The Morale Effects of Pay Inequality (2016, neutral): “In addition, while previous work has focused on arbitrary wage changes, in our study wage differences reflect interpersonal differences in worker productivities; this better reflects why wage differences may arise in the labor market and is important given laboratory evidence that justifications mat”
A tractable model of process fairness under risk (2009, background): “First, in the program that studies the relative importance of outcome fairness and reciprocity (Brandts & Sola, 2001; Charness, 2004; Falk, Fehr, & Fischbacher, 2008 ), process fairness can be included as a third factor.”
Chapter 8 The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism – Experimental Evidence and New Theories (2006, methodology): “Falk et al. (2000a) conducted an experiment, invented by Abbink, Irlenbusch and Renner (2000), that simultaneously allows for the examination of positive and negative reciprocity.”
Cutthroat Capitalism versus Cuddly Socialism: Are Americans More Meritocratic and Efficiency-Seeking than Scandinavians? (2020, neutral): “Finally, the paper also contributes to the large experimental literature on the nature of social preferences (Almås et al., 2010; Andreoni and Miller, 2002; Balafoutas et al., 2013; Bellemare et al., 2008; Cappelen et al., 2007, 2013a; Charness and Rabin, 2002; Durante et al., 2014; Engelmann and St”
Gift Exchange and Workers' Fairness Concerns: When Equality is Unfair (2010, neutral): “In light of the literature that stresses the behavioral importance of intentions in situations of reciprocal interaction (e.g., Dufwenberg and Kirchsteiger 2004, Falk et al. 2008a), there is thus a potential alternative explanation for our treatment effect.”
Dictating the Risk: Experimental Evidence on Giving in Risky Environments (2013, background): “Falk and Fischbacher (2008) show that besides distributional preferences on the fairness of outcomes, the interpretation of fairness intentions plays an important role in subjects' decisions.”
Cheating in Mind Games: The Subtlety of Rules Matters (2013, neutral): “For moral judgement, intentions matter (Charness & Dufwenberg, 2006; Falk, Fehr & Fischbacher, 2008).”