Perceptual measures of performance: Fact or fiction?
By R. G. Schroeder, Mikko Ketokivi. 2004
643 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Management Information Systems, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/25ed22c809429c5b43699acda897d6038d588b69
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Management Information Systems
- Angappa Gunasekaran
- Rameshwar Dubey
- Stephen J. Childe
- Christopher W. Craighead
- Dave J. Ketchen
- G. Tomas M. Hult
- Rachna Shah
- R. G. Schroeder
In Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
- Mark Pagell
- Barbara B. Flynn
- Nick Bontis
- Brian S. Fugate
- Ruzita Jusoh
- Kaveh Asiaei
- Rameshwar Dubey
- Angappa Gunasekaran
Citations in the corpus
- HR flexibility and firm performance: analysis of a multi-level causal model (2009, background): “Use of quasi-perceptual measures of performance, which defines the performance to be evaluated in objective terms (eg, profitability, market share, or cost efficiency) but seeks to measure the firm performance through the perception of the managers, has been found to be particularly helpful in ass”
- Manufacturing practices, strategic fit and performance: A routine‐based view (2004, neutral): “convergent and discriminant validity ( Ketokivi and Schroeder, 2003 ).”
- Toward a subjective measurement model for firm performance (2012, background): “Depending on the context, performance measurement may require indicators that are difficult to access (Ketokivi & Schroeder, 2004).”
- Addressing Common Method Variance: Guidelines for Survey Research on Information Technology, Operations, and Supply Chain Management (2011, methodology): “We certainly are not questioning the value of IRA or reliability measure, as they instill more confidence in a study’s results because they capture consistency and agreement between multiple sources [33].”