What Patent Data Reveal about Universities: The Case of Belgium

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature (2007, background): “(Lee and Gaertner 1994; Friedman and Silberman, 2003; Owen-Smith and Powell, 2003; Saragossi and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, 2003; Thursby and Thursby 2004; Grandi and Grimaldi, 2005; Powers and McDougall, 2005a); and how do entrepreneurial universities relate to entities outside the ivory…”
University patenting and its effects on academic research: The emerging European evidence (2006, background): “The studies by Balconi et al. (2003), Meyer (2003) and Saragossi and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie (2003) provide clear empirical evidence that the number of university invented patents is much higher than the number of patents owned by universities.”
Categories of university-level entrepreneurship: a literature survey (2010, background): “Owen-Smith and Powell (2001) Agrawal and Henderson (2002) Cohen et al. (2002) Feldman et al. (2002) Mowery et al. (2002) Mowery and Ziedonis (2002) Shane (2002) Thursby and Thursby (2002) Coupe (2003) Friedman and Silberman (2003) Hall et al. (2003) Nerkar and Shane (2003) Nicolaou and Birley (2003)”
Models and Methods of University Technology Transfer (2013, unknown): “Patent-based statistics may be a misleading indicator of a university’s technological productivity because many inventions are developed at one university but patented at another institution (Saragossi and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, 2003).”