Internet privacy concerns and their antecedents - measurement validity and a regression model

By Tamara Dinev, Paul J. Hart. Behavior and Information Technology, 2004

584 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/25370eb1a80578da590a33c43b3cb29c61b509cb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Information Systems and Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Internet Privacy Concerns: An Integrated Conceptualization and Four Empirical Studies (2013, background): “One concern is the fear that one’s browsing or clicking behavior is being monitored or tracked (Dinev and Hart 2004; Earp et al. 2005).”
An Experimental Study on Ubiquitous commerce Adoption: Impact of Personalization and Privacy Concerns (2008, methodology): “Customers’ privacy concerns arise from the feeling that their information is vulnerable and that they are not able to control their personal information (Dinev and Hart, 2004).”
Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns (2009, background): “Perceived ability to control information scale The perceived ability to control information scale (Dinev & Hart, 2004) contains four items.”
An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions (2006, background): “Model Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the Internet privacy concerns and perceived Internet privacy risk (PR) constructs were reported in Dinev and Hart (2004). In that article, two dimensions of Internet privacy concerns were identified: privacy concerns of information finding (PCIF) and privac”
Information Privacy Concerns: Linking Individual Perceptions with Institutional Privacy Assurances (2011, unknown): “Empirical evidence in other studies revealed that control is one of the key factors that provides the greatest degree of explanation for privacy concerns (Dinev & Hart, 2004; Phelps et al., 2000).”
Internet Privacy Concerns and Social Awareness as Determinants of Intention to Transact (2005, methodology): “The research hypotheses were tested empirically using data collected from a survey, using Dinev and Hart's instrument for measuring privacy concerns for information abuse, and intention to transact [17, 18] (items are shown in the Appendix).”
Information Privacy Research: An Interdisciplinary Review (2011, background): “Additionally, previous studies generally supported the positive impacts of privacy risk on privacy concerns (Dinev et al. 2006b; Dinev and Hart 2004), and the negative impacts of privacy risk on intention to disclose personal information (Malhotra et al. 2004; Xu et al. 2005).”
Privacy in the Digital Age: A Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems (2011, background): “The heavy use of CFIP even after an alternative was shown to work better could be the result of two situations: either research had already started when IUIPC was published, or CFIP is viewed as the de facto measure for information privacy concerns.”