The Emergence of Social Enterprise

By C. Borzaga, J. Defourny. 2001

951 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2491da2e469bd2fb9b5361b2e5a911f318c76674

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. B. Hoogendoorn
2. Bob Doherty
3. Leandro Sepúlveda
4. David Urbano
5. Fergus Lyon
6. R. Ridley-Duff
7. H. Haugh
8. Roy Thurik

In Strategy and Management

1. B. Hoogendoorn
2. Riccardo Bodini
3. M. Nyssens
4. J. Defourny
5. Léo‐Paul Dana
6. Robert Anderson
7. Enrico Pennings
8. Roy Thurik

Citations in the corpus

• Social Enterprises as Hybrid Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda (2014, background): “The dual mission to achieve financial sustainability and create social value by integrating the socially excluded and disadvantaged into the workplace categorizes a social firm as a SE (Borzaga and Defourny 2001).”
• What Do We Know about Social Entrepreneurship: An Analysis of Empirical Research (2010, methodology): “For the other papers, our review shows that the EMES approach is underrepresented in the list, despite some extensive empirical research conducted by the EMES research network since the turn of the century (Borzaga & Defourny, 2001; Nyssens, 2006).”
• Understanding Social Enterprise: Theory and Practice (2011, background): “In recent years, a new term - social enterprise - has been promoted throughout the world (Borzaga and Defourny, 2001).”
• The Social Economy in the European Union (2012, background): “The same may be said of other theoretical developments such as the social usefulness third sector (Lipietz, 2001), social enterprise (Borzaga and Defourny, 2001) or the new social economy (Spear, Defourny et al, 2001).”
• Indigenous Land Rights, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Development in Canada: 'Opting-In' to the Global Economy (2006, positive): “Surely these actions and objectives are entirely consistent with the description of social entrepreneurship by Pearce (2003), Borzaga and Defourny (2001), and Mort et al.”
• What to Make of Social Innovation? Towards a Framework for Policy Development (2014, methodology): “We use the term social enterprises here according to the European model as described by EMES (Borzaga and Defourny, 2001), which refers to private, autonomous collective organisations established with a social aim and which provide goods and services in a stable and continuous way.”
• Emerging models of social enterprise in Eastern Asia: a cross‐country analysis (2011, background): “The first EMES book (Borzaga and Defourny, 2001), on The Emergence of Social Enterprise in Europe, was translated and published in Japanese in 2005.”
• Reconsidering capitalism: the promise of social innovation and social entrepreneurship? (2013, background): “Research on the emergence and scale of social enterprise (Borzaga and Defourny, 2001) also indicates that statistics about such ventures’ and their social innovations are incomplete, with few official figures able to provide a detailed understanding of their scale, size and impact.”
• Social Entrepreneurship: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead (2010, neutral): “(Borzaga and Defourny, 2001)”
• Analyzing Social Entrepreneurship from an Institutional Perspective: Evidence from Spain (2010, background): “Fowler (2000) and Borzaga and Defourny (2001) also suggest that these new forms of social entrepreneurship go beyond the current concept of the nonprofit sector and the social economy, and recommend examining them as a new kind of social entrepreneurship and civic innovation.”