Understanding Social Enterprise: Theory and Practice

By R. Ridley-Duff, M. Bull. 2011

309 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/51a7a464b74ec6cdf3216718a0e17d3cac3f1223

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Measurement as legitimacy versus legitimacy of measures: Performance evaluation of social enterprise (2013, background): “INTRODUCTION Within the wider third sector, social enterprises - which we define as organisations that exist for a social purpose and trade (both formally and informally) to fulfil their mission (Barraket et al., 2010; Ridley-Duff and Bull, 2011) - are an important and growing component.”
Social Enterprise – A New Phenomenon in the Field of Economic and Social Welfare? (2015, background): “…enterprise in the UK policy arena is intimately linked to the New Labour government (1997–2010) and to political actors within the co-operative and community business movements which endorsed social enterprise (Brown 2003; Ridley-Duff and Bull 2011; Teasdale 2012) as a ‘policy idea’ (Béland 2005).”
Playing with Numbers: A Methodological Critique of the Social Enterprise Growth Myth (2013, background): “…and community development movements, sympathetic Labour politicians, and members of left leaning think tanks adopted the concept of social enterprise as part of an ideological aim to radically change the ways of organising markets (Westall 2001, Grenier 2009, Ridley-Duff and Bull 2011).”
Social enterprise versus social entrepreneurship: An examination of the ‘why’ and ‘how’ in pursuing social change (2013, background): “…needs (Dees, 1998a; Emerson and Twersky, 1996), which provide an alternative to non-profit, charitable and profit-maximising private enterprises (Ridley-Duff and Bull, 2011), while social entrepreneurship is regarded as a more innovative way of addressing social needs by developing new and…”