Analyzing Social Entrepreneurship from an Institutional Perspective: Evidence from Spain

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Social Entrepreneurship in Non-munificent Institutional Environments and Implications for Institutional Work: Insights from China (2017, unknown): “So far, research on social entrepreneurship has mostly employed single case studies (Choi and Majumdar 2014; Dey and Steyaert 2010; Mair and Martı́ 2006; Short et al. 2009) with a few exceptions (see Desa 2012; Kistruck et al. 2013; Urbano et al. 2010).”
Social entrepreneurship education in higher education: insights from a developing country (2013, background): “…p.519) discussed the notion of enhancing “social wealth by creating new ventures or managing existing organizations in an innovative manner”, while Urbano et al. (2010) used institutional theory to examine how institutional factors affect the emergence and implementation of social…”
Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship (2015, background): “Correspondingly, research has shown that social enterprises are initially reliant on the institutions not only for stability but also for the coordination and reproduction of knowledge (Urbano et al., 2010), particularly during the early phases of a social innovation (Kistruck & Beamish, 2010; Towns”
Social entrepreneurship research: A review and future research agenda (2020, background): “Social enterprises merge the pursuit of public social goods with the market-aligned tools and techniques of for-profit organisations (Urbano, Toledano, & Soriano, 2010).”