Size-dependent resistivity of metallic wires in the mesoscopic range
By W. Steinhögl, G. Schindler, G. Steinlesberger, M. Engelhardt. 2002
493 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/24234ba04b1b778cc0353571017b56e995a0db64
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- James D. Meindl
- A. Naeemi
- Kaustav Banerjee
- Yehia Massoud
- Arthur Nieuwoudt
- Eric Pop
- Hongjie Dai
- Navin Srivastava
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Kaustav Banerjee
- Navin Srivastava
- A. Naeemi
- James D. Meindl
- Eric Pop
- Kenneth E. Goodson
- Hong Li
- Yehia Massoud
In Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- James D. Meindl
- A. Naeemi
- Kaustav Banerjee
- Yehia Massoud
- Arthur Nieuwoudt
- Eric Pop
- Kenneth E. Goodson
- Hongjie Dai
Citations in the corpus
- Evaluating the impact of resistance in carbon nanotube bundles for VLSI interconnect using diameter-dependent modeling techniques (2006, background): “is on the same order as the wire dimensions [2], [3].”
- Electrical and thermal transport in metallic single-wall carbon nanotubes on insulating substrates (2006, background): “0026 K -1 , which is very near that of 40 nm diameter copper vias [44].”
- Scaling analysis of multilevel interconnect temperatures for high-performance ICs (2005, methodology): “As temperature increases, increases linearly and decreases satisfying constant [ 16 ].”
- Energy dissipation and transport in nanoscale devices (2010, background): “For instance, the electrical resistivity of Cu interconnects with line widths below 100 nm increases by more than a factor of two from the bulk Cu resistivity [130], and the resistivity for line widths near 40 nm was shown to increase by at least a factor of four [131, 132] at room temperature.”
- Performance comparison between carbon nanotube and copper interconnects for gigascale integration (GSI) (2005, background): “The results offer important guidance regarding the nature of carbon nanotube technology development needed for improving interconnect performance.”