The Dangerous Passion: Why Jealousy Is as Necessary as Love and Sex

By David M. Buss. 2000

548 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/240eef626ce05ecf457f2ebd8eb53aaedf30efe4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Jealousy mediates the relationship between attractiveness comparison and females' indirect aggression (2012, background): “…initial findings, future research might explore potential relationships between various types of jealousy such as reactive, preventive, and anxious jealousy (Buunk, 1997) as well as evaluate potential differences in the effects of emotional versus sexual jealousy (see Buss, 2000; Harris, 2003).”
Attractive Women Want it All: Good Genes, Economic Investment, Parenting Proclivities, and Emotional Commitment1 (2008, background): “Humans possess a menu of mating strategies that includes long-term mating, shortterm opportunistic copulations, extra-pair copulations, and serial mating (Buss, 1994/2003; 2007; Buss and Schmitt, 1993; Gangestad and Simpson, 2000; Greiling and Buss, 2000; Symons, 1979).”
Gender-related reactions to gratuitous sex appeals in advertising (2008, background): “Similarly, Buss (2000) lists several reasons women might develop more positive attitudes toward uncommitted sex under certain conditions: for example, to engage in mate switching, to cultivate a potential back-up mate (termed “mate insurance”), to acquire immediate economic benefits, etc.”
Distress about mating rivals (2000, unknown): “Personal Relationships, 7 (2000), 235-243.”
Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Contextual Factors in Engaging in and Responding to Extramarital Involvement (2006, background): “…reasons for certain findings, there are applications of theory to EMI, including evolutionary psychology theory (e.g., Gangestad & Thornhill, 1997; Buss, 2000; Wright, 1994); social constructionist theory, including models of gender and cultural socialization models (e.g., Atwood & Seifer, 1997;…”
Sexual Strategies: A Journey Into Controversy (2003, unknown): “I tested novel hypotheses about conflict between the sexes in the mating arena (Buss, 1989a, 1991), which led to studies on jealousy and eventually homicide (Buss, 2000; Buss, Larsen, Westen, & Semmelroth, 1992).”
Strategies of Human Mating (2006, background): “These sex differences have been replicated in subsequent studies (see Buss, 2000, for a summary).”
Hook-up behavior: A biopsychosocial perspective. (2008, background): “This scenario has been argued to explain the sex differences in tolerance for emotional versus sexual infidelity, and ensuing jealousy variants ( Buss, 2000; Buss, Larsen, Westen, & Semmelroth, 1992; Miller & Maner, 2008).”
Physical Attractiveness in Adaptationist Perspective. (2015, background): “How attractive am I to others as a mate (e.g., Buss, 2000; Gangestad & Simpson 2000)?”
Evolutionary neuromarketing: darwinizing the neuroimaging paradigm for consumer behavior (2008, background): “Although jealousy is important in maintaining and protecting pair bonds (Buss, 2000), attraction is the first response in initiating a desired pair bond, a topic to which we tum to next.”
The evolution of human mating. (2007, background): “These sex differences have been replicated in subsequent studies (see Buss, 2000, for a summary).”