All Things Great and Small: Organizational Size, Boundaries of the Firm, and a Changing Environment

By Matthew A. Josefy, Scott Kuban, R. Duane Ireland, Michael A. Hitt. 2015

255 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Walking and Talking Corporate Social Responsibility: Implications of Firm Size and Organizational Cost (2016, unknown): “It is because of this general consensus in the literature about the predictive capacity of ﬁrm size (e.g., Child, 1973; for a recent review see Josefy et al., 2015) that we single out this variable.”
Organizational responses to performance feedback: A meta-analytic review (2019, background): “Firm size can be a proxy for resources, market power, bureaucracy, and complexity—all of these factors associated with size can interact to shape organizational responses to performance feedback (Josefy et al., 2015).”
Funding Financial Inclusion: Institutional Logics and the Contextual Contingency of Funding for Microfinance Organizations (2016, background): “With this in mind, we expect that the attention of public funders will shift toward MFO size when uncertainty increases, as largerMFOsaremore likely to be seen as able toweather uncertainty (Josefy et al., 2015).”
Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021, background): “One such reasoning, referred to as category (f) in Table 1 and as also suggested by Short (2009), is that an earlier review of the same topic exists and that the later review excludes the coverage period of the prior review (e.g., Josefy et al., 2015; Schilke et al., 2018).”