Funding Financial Inclusion: Institutional Logics and the Contextual Contingency of Funding for Microfinance Organizations

204 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management (2017, background): “…differentiation are multifaceted and mutually enabling (Philippe and Durand, 2011), and that firms face environmental complexity where the nature and relative strengths of conformity and differentiation pressures change across time and space (Cobb, Wry, and Zhao, 2016; Durand and Paolella, 2013).”
Digital Sustainability and Entrepreneurship: How Digital Innovations Are Helping Tackle Climate Change and Sustainable Development (2020, background): “Scholars have engaged grand challenges by looking at incumbents ( Luo et al., 2016 ), NGOs ( Mair et al., 2016 ), single-purpose organizations ( Cobb et al., 2016 ), partnerships (Doh et al., 2018), and supply chains ( Kim & Davis, 2016 ).”
An institutional logics approach to social entrepreneurship: Market logic, religious diversity, and resource acquisition by microfinance organizations (2016, methodology): “Cobb et al. (2016) also focused on the role of state and showed that the political and financial uncertainty of a nation significantly shapes the funding practices of different types of capital providers.”