Security analysis of logic obfuscation

486 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

On Improving the Security of Logic Locking (2016, unknown): “Automation Conference 2012 [18].”
A Primer on Hardware Security: Models, Methods, and Metrics (2014, unknown): “Section VII concludes the paper.”
AppSAT: Approximately deobfuscating integrated circuits (2017, methodology): “For 41 out of the 43 combinational circuits the XOR/XNOR key bits were a perfect match.”
Evaluating the security of logic encryption algorithms (2015, methodology): “Three sets of results are shown, the partial-break algorithm, the fault-analysis algorithm from [17] and a hybrid algorithm which runs the fault-analysis attack and partial-break algorithm iteratively.”
Provably-Secure Logic Locking: From Theory To Practice (2017, background): “In [34], two key bits are considered pairwise-secure i the sensitization of one key bit cannot be done without controlling the other key bit and vice versa.”
Security analysis of integrated circuit camouflaging (2013, methodology): “An algorithm to insert XOR/XNOR gates for a stronger obfuscation has been proposed in [31].”
SARLock: SAT attack resistant logic locking (2016, background): “Several researchers have exploited the weaknesses of different combinational logic locking techniques and developed attacks that recover the secret key [8], [11], [13], [14].”