Effects of wireless physical layer modeling in mobile ad hoc networks

By Mineo Takai, Jay Martin, Rajive L. Bagrodia. ACM Interational Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing, 2001

440 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/22def2a3a96ab6ab22241926a2231933e565775e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

Citations in the corpus

Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication: Fair Transmit Power Control for Safety-Critical Information (2009, background): “, [45]), although ns-2 [6] is a widely used network simulator, it shows (in its standard release) insufficient accuracy in the lower layers of its wireless modules.”
A Survey on Wireless Security: Technical Challenges, Recent Advances, and Future Trends (2015, methodology): “Wireless networks generally adopt the OSI protocol architecture [5] comprising the application layer, transport layer, network layer [6], MAC layer [7] and physical layer [8], [9].”
Performance evaluation of safety applications over DSRC vehicular ad hoc networks (2004, methodology): “Physical layer performance does not only affect the absolute performance of a protocol, it can even change the relative ranking among the protocols for the same scenario since its impact on different protocols may be non-uniform [37].”
Effectiveness of RTS/CTS handshake in IEEE 802.11 based ad hoc networks (2003, methodology): “According to [12], QualNet incorporates a detailed model of the physical channel and of the IEEE 802.”
An evaluation of inter-vehicle ad hoc networks based on realistic vehicular traces (2006, background): “However, according to many researchers these assumptions do not hold and the basic simple propagation models alone do not reflect the complexity of real radio systems [44, 41, 20].”
Connectivity of Wireless Multihop Networks in a Shadow Fading Environment (2003, background): “In fact, it was shown in [11, 12] that a more accurate modeling of the physical layer is indeed important in network–level research on wireless multihop networks.”
What is the right model for wireless channel interference? (2006, background): “While our work supports the findings in [14], we further show that not only is the capture threshold model optimistic as compared to an additive interference model, but there are qualitative differences in the predictions of the two models, and they can result in different structural insights.”
Broadcast reception rates and effects of priority access in 802.11-based vehicular ad-hoc networks (2004, background): “Vehicle-to-vehicle communications and vehicular ad hoc networks are recently addressed, for example, within the DSRC (WAVE) working group [1] and in national collaborations like the German FleetNet and NOW projects [2, 3] or the Japanese Internet-ITS project [4].”
A survey on real-world implementations of mobile ad-hoc networks (2007, background): “Various studies have shown that the relative ranking of protocol performance can depend on the simulator or different physical layer models chosen for the study [79], [49].”
On the accuracy of MANET simulators (2002, background): “The modelisation of the physical layer in NS-2 and OPNET have already been presented in [12] as well as the important parameters that influence its behavior.”
How effective is the IEEE 802.11 RTS/CTS handshake in ad hoc networks (2002, methodology): “According to [9], QualNet incorporates a detailed and accurate model of the physical channel and of the IEEE 802.”