Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation.
By S. Maxwell, David A. Cole. Psychological methods, 2007
2,810 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/224eba4bac34acf8de07dedc7a9059d3f4537f9d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
- Kristopher J Preacher
- Andrew F. Hayes
- Paul E. Jose
- H. Zacher
- Alexander Newman
- Adrian H. Pitariu
- John E. Mathieu
- Robert E. Ployhart
Citations in the corpus
- Longitudinal Research: The Theory, Design, and Analysis of Change (2010, background): “Such understanding leads to the realization that cross-sectional research will often provide little insight into how a variable will change over time and may quite often lead to inaccurate conclusions (Maxwell & Cole, 2007).”
- The Influence of Project Commitment and Team Commitment on the Relationship between Trust and Knowledge Sharing in Project Teams (2017, background): “Despite noteworthy questioning of the accuracy of a cross-sectional approach for assessing mediation (Maxwell & Cole, 2007; Maxwell, Cole, & Mitchell, 2011), most studies involving mediation have used cross-sectional data (Mitchell & Maxwell, 2013).”
- Transformational Leadership and Well-Being in Sports: The Mediating Role of Need Satisfaction (2014, background): “In particular, longitudinal research that addresses the mediating processes more accurately is warranted (Maxwell & Cole, 2007).”
- Parent–Adolescent Sexual Communication and Adolescents’ Sexual Behaviors: A Conceptual Model and Systematic Review (2016, background): “Such effects are best supported by temporally-ordered data, given that a mediated process assumes the passage of time as a sequence of events unfolds (Maxwell and Cole 2007), but this information is not provided by cross sectional data.”
- Happiness, inspiration and the fully functioning person: Separating hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in the workplace (2012, background): “For instance, multilevel modeling permits the spacing between time points to vary for each person, which is beneficial for the handling of missing responses (Maxwell & Cole, 2007 ).”
- Feeling Good Makes Us Stronger: How Team Resilience Mediates the Effect of Positive Emotions on Team Performance (2016, background): “However, team resilience is illustrated as a possible mechanism that links emotional states and behavioral outcomes, although it needs to be confirmed by longitudinal data (Maxwell and Cole 2007).”
- Clarifying the Concept of Well-Being: Psychological Need Satisfaction as the Common Core Connecting Eudaimonic and Subjective Well-Being (2019, methodology): “…motives/activities and SWB is found in three-wave fully longitudinal research studies as currently recommended for mediation testing (e.g., Maxwell & Cole, 2007; Maxwell, Cole, & Mitchell, 2011) that have shown how various T1 variables predict changes in SWB at T3, mediated by changes in…”
- Over Time Effects of Role Stress on Psychological Strain among Malaysian Public University Academics (2011, background): “However, most studies to investigate stress process mainly based on cross-sectional design (Maxwell & Cole, 2007).”
- Self-esteem and the quality of romantic relationships (2016, background): “Therefore, future research on the mediating mechanisms should use longitudinal designs, which allows disentangling the temporal order of predictor, mediator, and outcome (Cole & Maxwell, 2003; Maxwell & Cole, 2007).”
- Transitioning From High School to College (2013, methodology): “Because we controlled for initial levels of all our constructs, these results can be viewed as predicting change over time (Maxwell & Cole, 2007).”