International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Review and Conceptual Framework for Understanding Personalized Matching Effects in Persuasion (2020, background): “Depending on the context, different affective and cognitive states will be more or less salient (cf., Grigorenko & Sternberg, 1995; Keltner & Lerner, 2010), making them more or less viable targets for matched appeals.”