Transportation as a Stimulus to Welfare-to-Work: Private Versus Public Mobility

By Robert Cervero, Onésimo Sandoval, J. Landis. 2000

233 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/21eb793189a4a7eda200e7af6ef56ad837d7bc42

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Joe Grengs
2. Corinne Mulley
3. Liang Ma
4. J. Kent
5. Evelyn Blumenberg

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Joe Grengs
2. Thomas W Sanchez
3. Evelyn Blumenberg
4. Z. Peng
5. Qing Shen
6. Corinne Mulley
7. Liang Ma
8. J. Kent

In Transportation

1. Joe Grengs
2. Thomas W Sanchez
3. Evelyn Blumenberg
4. Z. Peng
5. Qing Shen
6. Corinne Mulley
7. Liang Ma
8. J. Kent

Citations in the corpus

• Nonwork Accessibility as a Social Equity Indicator (2015, methodology): “…distance as the cost variable (for example, Ong and Blumenberg 1998), travel time is the most common measure of cost and the one used in this study (Cervero et al. 2002; Grengs 2004; Handy 1993; Helling 1998; Hess 2005; Kawabata 2003; Krizek 2003; Sanchez et al. 2004; Shen 1998; Wachs and Kumagai…”
• Transit Mobility, Jobs Access and Low-income Labour Participation in US Metropolitan Areas (2004, background): “Studies in Dade County, Florida, and Alameda County, California, found little or no relationship between public transport access to employment locations and employment participation (see Thompson, 1997; Cervero et al., 2002).”
• Transport disadvantage, social exclusion, and subjective well-being: The role of the neighborhood environment—evidence from Sydney, Australia (2018, methodology): “For example, using data on welfare recipients in Alameda County, California, Cervero, Sandoval, and Landis (2002) found that car ownership was a significant predictor of transition to employment, while public-transport service quality variables were largely insignificant.”
• Beyond the Spatial Mismatch: Welfare Recipients and Transportation Policy (2004, background): “And among the relatively small percentage of reverse-commute trips, the overwhelming majority (nineteen of every twenty) was taken by automobile (Cervero et al. 2002).”
• Job accessibility and the modal mismatch in Detroit (2010, background): “…access to automobiles may be one of the more effective means of improving the employment outcomes of inner-city residents (Blumenberg and Ong, 2001; Cervero et al., 2002; Lucas and Nicholson, 2003; O’Regan and Quigley, 1998; Raphael and Stoll, 2001; Shen, 1998; Taylor and Ong, 1995; Wachs and…”