Transit Mobility, Jobs Access and Low-income Labour Participation in US Metropolitan Areas

262 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Nonwork Accessibility as a Social Equity Indicator (2015, methodology): “…as the cost variable (for example, Ong and Blumenberg 1998), travel time is the most common measure of cost and the one used in this study (Cervero et al. 2002; Grengs 2004; Handy 1993; Helling 1998; Hess 2005; Kawabata 2003; Krizek 2003; Sanchez et al. 2004; Shen 1998; Wachs and Kumagai 1973).”
Job accessibility and the modal mismatch in Detroit (2010, methodology): “When compared with some of the nation’s most distressed central cities, all three of these cases – Boston, Los Angeles, and San Francisco – enjoy relatively healthy regional economies, with reasonably vibrant central cores despite pockets of high-poverty, and public transportation systems that inclu”
Race, space, and unemployment duration (2005, background): “[18] and [20,21], our sample includes workers across 158 different metropolitan areas.”
Impact of Light Rail Implementation on Labor Market Accessibility: A Transportation Equity Perspective (2012, background): “focused on carless welfare recipients in particular, while other studies focused on the general welfare clients (Cervero et al., 2002; Sanchez et al., 2004), female welfare recipients (Thakuriah & Metaxatos, 2000), welfare leavers (Bania et al.”