Appraising Research: Evaluation in Academic Writing

By S. Hood. 2010

315 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2148df0772c8e54028ecf898219596f66ef48151

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Paul Thompson
2. Thu Ngo
3. L. Unsworth
4. Ken Hyland
5. Douglas Biber

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Paul Thompson
2. Thu Ngo
3. L. Unsworth
4. Ken Hyland
5. Raffaella Negretti
6. Douglas Biber
7. A. Molino
8. Jim McKinley

Citations in the corpus

• The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes (2016, result): “In common with the results of EAP research in tertiary contexts (Hood, 2010; Hyland, 2004; Wingate, 2012), learning English within school disciplines has been found to provide access not only to ‘high stakes’ literacies (Byrnes, 2013; Maton, 2013), but also to understandings of the way discipline kn”
• Reworking the appraisal framework in ESL research: refining attitude resources (2015, background): “…been applied extensively to explore the evaluative aspect of language in a wide range of contexts including educational (Macken-Horarik 2003, Macken-Horarik, Love, and Unsworth 2011, Hood 2010, Macken-Horarik and Isaac 2014), professional (Lipovsky 2008, 2013) and political (Miller 2007) contexts.”