Staying on farms: An Ideological Background

By P. Nilsson. 2002

281 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/21231ab58bc96ecd5c26f4849a04de1b049939ef

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Supporting innovation for tourism development through multi-stakeholder approaches: Experiences from Africa (2013, background): “However tourism supports local employment and provides opportunities for contact with indigenous residents and cultures (Nilsson, 2002).”
Agritourism and Sustainability: What We Can Learn from a Systematic Literature Review (2020, background): “However, agritourism and rural tourism are not properly synonymous since the first represents a subset of the latter activities [35,36].”
Does rural tourism benefit from agriculture (2005, background): “It seems that many researchers agree that the role of the farm and farmer is to supply the background that provides farm tourism with its unique features (Pearce, 1990; Nilsson, 2002).”
The Role of the Firm and Owner Characteristics on the Performance of Agritourism Farms (2008, background): “(Fleischer and Pizam 1997; Nilson 2002; Sharpley 2002).”
Assessing the sustainability of agritourism in the US: a comparison between agritourism and other farm entrepreneurial ventures (2013, background): “cabins, camping sites), hunting and fishing for a fee, on-farm sales and gift shops, lodging and food services, programming special events such as private parties and festivals, among many others activities (Nilsson, 2002; Tew & Barbieri, 2012).”
America's Changing Farmscape: A Study of Agricultural Tourism in Michigan* (2006, background): “…as alpine Austria for nearly one-hundred years (Pevetz 1991), it has recently become a key strategy in the EU’s 1992 and 1996 Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) to diversify agricultural economies impacted by cost-price squeezes and the technological treadmill (Busby and Rendle 2000; Nilsson 2002).”