Competitive Strategy Dynamics

By K. Warren. 2002

288 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/210ee5b1fa7933257cfc5dc61b04ac50578c6a0b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Patrick G. Maggitti
2. David F. Andersen
3. Ken G. Smith
4. George P. Richardson
5. Etiënne A. J. A. Rouwette
6. Thomas D. Clark Jr.
7. J. Vennix
8. Mary C. Jones

Citations in the corpus

• The Red Queen Effect: Competitive Actions And Firm Performance (2008, background): “positive benefits for the focal firm (Warren, 2002).”
• Group model building: problem structuring, policy simulation and decision support (2007, methodology): “…identified: (1) the Reference Group approach (Stenberg 1980), (2) the Strategic Forum (Richmond 1997), (3) the stepwise approach (Wolstenholme 1992), (4) modelling as learning (Lane 1992), (5) strategy dynamics (Warren 1999; 2002; 2005), and (6) the “standard method” of Hines (Otto & Struben 2004).”
• The Dynamic Structure of Management Support Systems: Theory Development, Research Focus, and Direction (2007, methodology): “This approach is employed to present the framework and to focus on the important relationships that interact through complex feedback mechanisms to produce behavior, and is used because it has been shown to be an excellent way to portray the interrelationships within and resulting behavior caused by”