Group model building: problem structuring, policy simulation and decision support

By David F. Andersen, J. Vennix, George P. Richardson, Etiënne A. J. A. Rouwette. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2007

299 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/64a0a4d26abca125d5aa6b6ac8529e187426ea97

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Anthony J. Jakeman
2. Holger R. Maier
3. John C. Mingers
4. Mark E. Borsuk
5. Alexey A. Voinov
6. Graeme C. Dandy
7. Kwok-Wing Chau

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. K. Rux
2. David F. Andersen
3. Anthony J. Jakeman
4. John C. Mingers
5. A. Calhoun
6. Peter Hovmand
7. George P. Richardson
8. Mark E. Borsuk

Citations in the corpus

• A review of the recent contribution of systems thinking to operational research and management science (2010, background): “Andersen et al (2007) argue that SD-based group model building should be seen as a problem structuring method.”
• Group Model-Building 'Scripts' as a Collaborative Planning Tool (2012, background): “More recently, Andersen et al. (2007) presented a more comprehensive review of current research in GMB using system dynamics.”
• Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management (2013, methodology): “Thirdly, the system dynamics literature has made rich contributions to approaches that inform the modelling process, including: data collection methods (e.g. Luna-Reyes and Andersen, 2003), knowledge elicitation/mapping techniques, and policy analysis (e.g. Andersen et al., 2007).”