Cognitive dissonance and resistance to change: the influence of commitment confirmation and feedback on judgment usefulness of accounting systems

By Johnny Jermias. 2001

112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, General Decision Sciences, Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/20f2ecba7e43f8e822bf047051aa4cd394a012c4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Sarah E. Bonner
2. Geoffrey B. Sprinkle
3. R. Hannan
4. Kristy L. Towry

In General Decision Sciences

1. Sarah E. Bonner
2. Geoffrey B. Sprinkle
3. Kristy L. Towry
4. K. Maas
5. R. Hannan
6. Jeffrey A. Wong
7. Stephen B. Salter
8. Andrea R. Drake

In Management Information Systems

1. Sarah E. Bonner
2. Geoffrey B. Sprinkle
3. R. Hannan

Citations in the corpus

• Fifty-Year Overview of Judgment and Decision-Making Research in Accounting (2011, unknown): “…fixation (Luft and Shields, 2001; Arunachalam and Beck, 2002; Dearman and Shields, 2005) and escalation of commitment to an unprofitable investment (Kadous and Sedor, 2004; Denison, 2009) or course of action (Jermias, 2001), the key development was the growth in interest in mental models.”
• The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task performance: theories, evidence, and a framework for research (2002, background): “For example, accounting researchers have examined, either in isolation or in conjunction with other person, task and environmental variables, how factors such as time pressure (McDaniel, 1990; Spilker, 1995), accountability (Kennedy, 1993, 1995; Peecher, 1996), assigned goals (Chow, 1983; Hirst & Ye”