Bioinformatic discovery of microRNA precursors from human ESTs and introns
By Sung-Chou Li, Chao-Yu Pan, Wen-Chang Lin. BMC Genomics, 2006
446 citations recorded by the source corpus.
BackgroundMicroRNAs (miRNAs) function in many physiological processes, and their discovery is beneficial for further studying their physiological functions. However, many of the miRNAs predicted from genomic sequences have not been experimentally validated to be authentic expressed RNA transcripts, thereby decreasing the reliability of miRNA discovery. To overcome this problem, we examined expressed transcripts – ESTs and intronic sequences – to identify novel miRNAs as well as their target genes.ResultsTo facilitate our approach, we developed our scanning method using criteria based on the features of 207 known human pre-miRNAs to discriminate miRNAs from random sequences. We identified 208 candidate hairpins in human ESTs and human reference gene intronic sequences, 52 of which are known pre-miRNAs. The discovery pipeline performance was further assessed using 130 newly updated pre-miRNA and randomly selected sequences. We achieved sensitivity of 85% (110/130) and overall specificity of 49.7% using this method. Because miRNAs are evolutionarily conserved regulators of gene expression, it is expected that their host genes and target genes should have respective phylogenetic orthologs. Our results confirmed that, in certain mammals, the host genes carrying the same miRNAs are orthologs, as previously reported. Moreover, this observation is also the case for some of the miRNA target genes.ConclusionWe have predicted 208 human pre-miRNA candidates and over 10,000 putative human target genes. Using sequence information from ESTs and introns ensures that the predicted pre-miRNA candidates are expressed and the combined expression transcription information from ESTs and introns makes our prediction results more decisive with regard to expressed pre-miRNAs.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/206f67799f7f9729839d85a9d09a6ec83c3f14b5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- E. Ringø
- Victor Kunin
- Susan M. Huse
- Patrick D. Schloss
- S. Shokralla
- P. Taberlet
- Zhigang Zhou
- C. Suttle
Citations in the corpus
- Next-generation DNA sequencing methods. (2008, background): “These studies include previously sampled environments such as the ocean (2, 19, 42) and an acid mine site (13), but soil (14, 27) and coral reefs (54) also were studied by Roche/454 pyrosequencing.”
- Gene-centric metagenomics of the fiber-adherent bovine rumen microbiome reveals forage specific glycoside hydrolases (2009, methodology): “The sequences were compared using the BLASTX algorithm with an expected cutoff of 1 10 5 (27).”
- Next‐generation sequencing technologies for environmental DNA research (2012, background): “Rare and extreme habitats such as acid mines (Edwards et al. 2006) and coral reefs (Wegley et al. 2007) are now also readily subjected to NGS-based analysis of biodiversity.”
- Identifying biologically relevant differences between metagenomic communities (2010, methodology): “Two samples from distinct habitats within the Soudan Iron Mine in Minnesota, USA, were sequenced and analyzed by Edwards et al. (2006). The ‘black’ sample (pH 6.7, redox potential -142 mV) was taken from water within a borehole, and the ‘red’ sample (pH 4.37, redox potential -8 mV) was taken a few c”
- A Bioinformatician's Guide to Metagenomics (2008, methodology): “Alternative strategies have also been used, namely, pyrosequencing (89), which has been applied to viral (9) and bacterial (36) communities.”
- ecoPrimers: inference of new DNA barcode markers from whole genome sequence analysis (2011, methodology): “To identify barcodes similar to those used in bacterial biodiversity studies of soil (33), ecoPrimers was run on this data set using default parameters and searching for a marker of size smaller than 1 Kb (kilobases).”
- Effect of dietary components on the gut microbiota of aquatic animals. A never‐ending story? (2016, methodology): “Next-generation sequencing technologies Pyrosequencing is another method that is used for high-throughput sequencing of clone libraries (e.g. Edwards et al. 2006; Jones et al. 2009).”
- The Marine Viromes of Four Oceanic Regions (2006, methodology): “Using this approach, it is possible to rapidly characterize the metabolic diversity and community structure of any microbial ecosystem [10–19].”
- Accuracy and quality of massively parallel DNA pyrosequencing (2007, background): “For example, in metagenomic [7] or PCR amplicon [8] libraries from environmental DNA samples, each sequence read can theoretically represent DNA”