Accuracy and quality of massively parallel DNA pyrosequencing

By Susan M. Huse, J. Huber, Hilary G. Morrison, Mitchell L Sogin, D. Welch. Genome Biology, 2007

1,285 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BackgroundMassively parallel pyrosequencing systems have increased the efficiency of DNA sequencing, although the published per-base accuracy of a Roche GS20 is only 96%. In genome projects, highly redundant consensus assemblies can compensate for sequencing errors. In contrast, studies of microbial diversity that catalogue differences between PCR amplicons of ribosomal RNA genes (rDNA) or other conserved gene families cannot take advantage of consensus assemblies to detect and minimize incorrect base calls.ResultsWe performed an empirical study of the per-base error rate for the Roche GS20 system using sequences of the V6 hypervariable region from cloned microbial ribosomal DNA (tag sequencing). We calculated a 99.5% accuracy rate in unassembled sequences, and identified several factors that can be used to remove a small percentage of low-quality reads, improving the accuracy to 99.75% or better.ConclusionBy using objective criteria to eliminate low quality data, the quality of individual GS20 sequence reads in molecular ecological applications can surpass the accuracy of traditional capillary methods.

Subfields: Ecology, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b1abf125ee210202d05d9e21df121531e0f6b759

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

  1. Rob Knight
  2. Patrick D. Schloss
  3. Noah Fierer
  4. Dirk Gevers
  5. Sarah L. Westcott
  6. Micah Hamady
  7. Susan M. Huse
  8. C. Lauber

In Molecular Biology

  1. Rob Knight
  2. Patrick D. Schloss
  3. Curtis Huttenhower
  4. Noah Fierer
  5. Micah Hamady
  6. Dirk Gevers
  7. C. Lauber
  8. Nicola Segata

Citations in the corpus