Real-time compensation of hysteresis and creep in piezoelectric actuators

By H. Janocha, K. Kuhnen. 2000

190 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Hysteresis in Piezoelectric and Ferroelectric Materials (2006, methodology): “Using this approach, an impressive improvement of the actuator output could be obtained by simultaneously controlling creep and hysteresis [166].”
Feedforward control of piezoactuators in atomic force microscope systems (2009, background): “Also, the Preisach approach is studied in [21]–[24] for hysteresis compensation.”
Modeling and Compensation of Asymmetric Hysteresis Nonlinearity for Piezoceramic Actuators With a Modified Prandtl–Ishlinskii Model (2014, methodology): “Compared with the Preisach model, the main advantages of the P-I model are the reduced modeling complexity and the analytical inverse for the P-I model, thus making it more efficient for real-time applications [29]–[33].”
A Survey of Control Issues in Nanopositioning (2007, background): “models [156], differential equation models [157], or deterministic path models [111], [158].”
Modeling and Control of Piezo-Actuated Nanopositioning Stages: A Survey (2016, background): “…addition, the creep model (4) can be written as a weighted superposition of many elementary linear creep operators in the time domain, which is convenient to construct an inverse compensator together with the hysteresis compensator based on the Prandtl–Ishlinskii hysteresis model [19], [60], [61].”