Gender and entrepreneurship: a review and process model

By Diane M Sullivan, W. Meek. 2012

333 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1fb5344e799295b5a6afb70102c41b1e8a52c8c2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. M. Sharifian
2. P. Devereaux Jennings
3. M. Entrialgo
4. Dianna Dempsey
5. V. Iglesias
6. Marjan Gorgievski
7. David Mauricio
8. E. Cabrera

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Marjan Gorgievski
2. Dominika Wach
3. Ute Stephan
4. M. Entrialgo
5. Dianna Dempsey
6. Vincent Molly
7. A. Michiels
8. V. Iglesias

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Marjan Gorgievski
2. Dominika Wach
3. Ute Stephan
4. A. Michiels
5. P. Devereaux Jennings
6. M. Sharifian
7. M. Entrialgo
8. Dianna Dempsey

Citations in the corpus

• Living the Dream? Assessing the “Entrepreneurship as Emancipation” Perspective in a Developed Region (2016, result): “These patterns are consistent with those reported in recent reviews of the women’s entrepreneurship literature (e.g., Elam, 2008; Jennings & Brush, 2013; Sullivan & Meek, 2012).”
• Financing Decisions in Family Businesses: A Review and Suggestions for Developing the Field (2017, background): “Additionally, woman entrepreneurship studies have emphasized that female business owners tend to balance economic goals with noneconomic goals more often than their male counterparts (Hechavarria, Ingram, Justo, & Terjesen, 2012; Jennings & Brush, 2013; Sullivan & Meek, 2012).”
• Are the Intentions to Entrepreneurship of Men and Women Shaped Differently? The Impact of Entrepreneurial Role-Model Exposure and Entrepreneurship Education (2017, background): “Conversely, men have a wider network, so parental role models may have a greater effect on opportunity recognition and attitudes in women than men (Sullivan and Meek 2012).”
• More than money: Developing an integrative multi-factorial measure of entrepreneurial success (2016, background): “…that men value financial success while women value workplace relationships and shed further light on the notion that women may value multiple success criteria simultaneously while men may be more focused on a smaller number of criteria (Manolova et al., 2012; Sullivan and Meek, 2012; Tlaiss, 2013).”
• Women entrepreneurship: research review and future directions (2016, unknown): “…sociological theories to explain gender-based differences; Brush et al. (2009) used institutional theory to propose gender as a social construct; and Sullivan and Meek (2012) used expectancy theory, regulatory focus theory and social cognitive theory to study entrepreneurial process model concepts.”
• Advancing the Psychology of Entrepreneurship: A Review of the Psychological Literature and an Introduction (2016, background): “Sullivan & Meek (2012) Review Building on a process model of entrepreneurship, this article develops specific propositions for investigating female entrepreneurship issues associated with each stage, motivated by expectancy theory.”
• Factors affecting the success of women’s entrepreneurship: a review of literature (2017, methodology): “(3) Sullivan and Meek (2012), using Baron and Henry (2011)’s entrepreneurship process model, identify the following individual and situational factors in each stage: • For the motivation stage, individual factors such as career , encompassing self-realisation, financial success, participation,…”
• Gender and entrepreneurial self-efficacy: a learning perspective (2014, background): “, 2009) and as a potential avenue for women, in particular, to break through existing glass ceilings (Sullivan and Meek, 2012).”