General, Artistic and Scientific Creativity Attributes of Engineering and Music Students

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Assessing Creativity Specific to Engineering with the Revised Creative Engineering Design Assessment (2011, methodology): “In the present study, we selected the Form G of the Purdue Creativity Test, like other research (Charyton, 2005, 2008; Charyton and Snelbecker, 2007).”
Creative Thinking Ability: Domain Generality and Specificity (2010, background): “However, in the majority of studies, no gender differences in creative thinking were reported (eg, Baer & Kaufman, 2008 ; Charyton & Snelbecker, 2007 ; J.”
Personality and creativity in realistic, investigative, artistic, social, and enterprising college majors (2013, unknown): “They are also more likely to believe they are creative (Charyton & Snelbecker, 2007; Furnham, Batey, Booth, Patel, & Lozinskaya, 2011).”
Improving Creative Thinking Skills of Students through Differentiated Science Inquiry Integrated with Mind Map (2017, background): “Some claimed that gender did not give a significant difference to creative thinking skills (Baer & Kaufman, 2008; Bakir & Oztekin, 2014; Charyton & Snelbecker, 2007; Kaufman, 2006; Potur & Barkul, 2009; Tsai, 2013).”
Assessing General Creativity and Creative Engineering Design in First Year Engineering Students (2009, background): “Attributes such as temperament and personality may tend to be more stable traits (Charyton and Snelbecker, 2007; Gough, 1979; Oldham and Cummings, 1996).”