Corporate Social Performance as a Bottom Line for Consumers

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Impact of Corporate Social Performance on Financial Risk and Utility: A Longitudinal Analysis (2012, unknown): “Similarly, Meijer and Schuyt (2005) find that while consumers expect a firm’s CSP not to fall below some minimum threshold (or else they will boycott), high levels of social responsibility do not bring significantly increased product sales.”
The effects of environmental, social and governance disclosures and performance on firm value: A review of the literature in accounting and finance (2017, unknown): “Meijer and Schuyt (2005) investigate the impact of CSP in consumer behaviour and find that customers will react when it drops below a certain acceptable level (by boycotting the firm) but above average levels of CSP are not strongly associated with higher product sales.”
Organizational Ethics, Individual Ethics, and Ethical Intentions in International Decision-Making (2010, methodology): “This scale, one of the first developed to measure ethical attitudes, was modified and used further in studies by Paul et al. (1997) and Meijer and Schuyt (2005).”
Modelling the Firm in its Market and Organizational Environment: Methodologies for Studying Corporate Social Responsibility (2006, result): “Meijer and Schuyt (2005) replicated the study in the Netherlands, with similar results and across a wide range of income levels.”