Co-rumination in the friendships of girls and boys.

By Amanda J. Rose. Child Development, 2002

1,072 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1ee331b51722ae7ec15cecc3ff35347121e1e9d2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Kenneth H. Rubin
2. Julie C. Bowker
3. Justin P. Boren
4. Kaite Yang
5. J. Girgus
6. W. Bukowski
7. K. Salmela‐Aro
8. Susan Nolen-Hoeksema

In Education

1. Kenneth H. Rubin
2. Kaite Yang
3. J. Girgus
4. Julie C. Bowker
5. W. Bukowski
6. John E. Roberts
7. Christine A. Calmes
8. Benjamin L. Hankin

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. K. Salmela‐Aro
2. Justin P. Boren
3. Susan Nolen-Hoeksema
4. John E. Roberts
5. Christine A. Calmes
6. Kaite Yang
7. J. Girgus
8. René Veenstra

Citations in the corpus

• Children's Friendships: Shifts Over a Half-Century in Perspectives on Their Development and Their Effects (2004, background): “Most recent studies of individual differences in friendships have focused on the correlations of variations in friendship quality (e.g., Rose, 2002).”
• Peer relations as a developmental context. (2011, background): “C Corumina­ tion occurs when friends disclose their problems to one another, but then repeatedly go over and over the details of the problem and their feelings about them (Rose, 2002). r There are also cases in which friends simultaneously have both positive and nega­ tive effects.”
• Transformations in adolescent peer networks (2011, background): “In contrast, they hypothesized that interactions between two depressive friends are characterized by mutual feelings of understanding and high self-disclosure, which seem to increase closeness and intimacy between these friends (Rose, 2002).”
• Stress reactivity to co-rumination in young women’s friendships: Cortisol, alpha-amylase, and negative affect focus (2011, background): “Participants rated 27 items assessing co-rumination with same-sex friends on a 5-point scale (Rose, 2002).”
• The Distinct Roles of Sociometric and Perceived Popularity in Friendship (2012, background): “For example, friends who are depressed (Hogue & Steinberg, 1995) or reinforce ruminative coping styles (Rose, 2002) may diminish the benefits of friendship quantity.”
• “You Need to Stop Talking About This!”: Verbal Rumination and the Costs of Social Support (2013, background): “Most of the recent research on verbal rumination focuses on corumination or two people excessively discussing problems with each other (Rose, 2002), rather than verbal rumination where one person discloses his/her problems to another.”
• Developmental psychopathology: Pathways to the future (2006, neutral): “Bukowski and colleagues (this issue) review the progress in the study of interpersonal processes over the past decade in developmental psychopathology, highlighting recent studies of “co-rumination” (Rose, 2002) and “deviancy training” (Dishion, McCord, & Poulin, 1999).”
• Adolescent Peer Relations, Friendships, and Romantic Relationships: Do They Predict Social Anxiety and Depression? (2005, background): “It is possible that the qualities of best friendships (support, disclosure) may actually reinforce depressive feelings for some adolescents, if the adolescents discuss and revisit problems and focus on negative feelings, a process that has been referred to as co-rumination (Rose, 2002).”
• Network–Behavior Dynamics (2013, background): “In contrast, they hypothesized that interactions between two depressive friends are characterized by mutual feelings of understanding and high self-disclosure, which seem to increase closeness and intimacy between these friends (Rose, 2002).”
• PROTECTING US FROM OURSELVES: SOCIAL SUPPORT AS A BUFFER OF TRAIT AND STATE RUMINATION (2010, neutral): “(Calmes & Roberts, 2008; Rose, 2002), and greater corfisol responses (Byrd-Craven, Geary, Rose, & Ponzi, 2008).”
• A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. (2006, background): “…effects indicating that girls report more self-disclosure in friendships than do boys (Burhmester & Furman, 1987; Camarena, Sarigiani, & Peterson, 1990; Crockett, Losoff, & Peterson, 1984; Furman & Buhrmester, 1985; Lempers & Clark-Lempers, 1993; Rose, 2002; Zarbatany, McDougal, & Hymel, 2000).”
• Peer Contagion in Child and Adolescent Social and Emotional Development (2011, background): “Corumination is more common among girls and has been linked to depression, anxiety, and greater friendship quality among adolescents (Rose 2002).”