Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor-davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): Validation of a 10-item measure of resilience.

By L. Campbell-Sills, Murray B. Stein. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 2007

3,264 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Safety Research, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e92b2bfee075d2159b0a28c3c5c11a7e83bf7e0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Safety Research

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Defining and characterizing team resilience in elite sport (2013, result): “Results provided partial support for 23 the revised 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (Campbell-Sills & Stein, 2007; 24 Connor & Davidson, 2003) across samples of adolescent and adult Australian cricketers.”
The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) amongst Young Spanish Adults (2019, methodology): “The present research found one dimension solutions for both the revised 22-item scale and the 10item scale proposed by Campbell-Sills and Stein (2007). The 22-item scale fitted after items 3 (“Sometimes fate or God can help”) , 9 (“Things happen for a reason”) and 20 (“I have to act on a hunch”) wer”
Investigating the Relationship of Resilience to Academic Persistence in College Students With Mental Health Issues (2013, background): “The CD-RISC total scores have demonstrated strong reliability and validity (CampbellSills et al., 2006; Campbell-Sills & Stein, 2007; Connor & Davidson, 2003; Hartley, 2012).”
Degrees of resilience: profiling psychological resilience and prospective academic achievement in university inductees (2014, methodology): “Stage 1 Inductees completed the self-reported CD-RISC (Connor & Davidson, 2003) which is suitable for use with older adolescents in the context of education (Campbell-Sills & Stein, 2007; Singh & Yu, 2010).”
The Contributions of Emotional Intelligence and Social Support for Adaptive Career Progress Among Italian Youth (2015, methodology): “Resilience refers to the general capacity of individuals to face and overcome adversity and to cope with challenges beyond those typically encountered in the development process (Campbell-Sills & Stein, 2007; Luthar, 2006).”
A methodological review of resilience measurement scales (2011, neutral): “[14,17,23-42].”
Character strengths predict resilience over and above positive affect, self-efficacy, optimism, social support, self-esteem, and life satisfaction (2017, methodology): “The 10-item version (Campbell-Sills & Stein, 2007) of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC; Connor & Davidson, 2003) assesses the capacity to bounce back from adversity.”
Psychometric Evaluation of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in a Sample of Indian Students (2010, background): “However, Campbell-Sills and Stein (2007) described four factors on the basis of explanatory factor analysis of two samples viz., hardiness, social support/purpose, faith, and persistence.”
Validity and Reliability of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in Competitive Sport (2016, methodology): “The 10-item version of the CD-RISC emerged from analyses conducted by Campbell-Sills and Stein (2007) while examining the psychometric structure of the original CD-RISC in multiple samples totaling over 1700 college students (74% female).”
How Should We Measure Psychological Resilience in Sport Performers? (2013, methodology): “For example, items on the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC; Campbell-Sills & Stein, 2007; Connor & Davidson, 2003) solely tap into personal factors of resilience including control, commitment, challenge, adaptability, and problem solving.”
A grounded theory of psychological resilience in Olympic champions (2012, background): “There exists an urgent need to develop a sport-specific measure of resilience, since current measures, such as the Connor and Davidson Resilience Scale (Campbell-Sills & Stein, 2007; Connor & Davidson, 2003), only consider generic resilient qualities and not how these attributes come to the fore in ”