Effects of orthography on speech production in a form-preparation paradigm

By Markus F. Damian, Jeffrey S. Bowers. 2003

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c1dd9dd4a7d1a532da3e039c5157bbd2c7f611d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: a psycholinguistic grain size theory. (2005, background): “The influence of orthography on spoken language processing can also be demonstrated with completely literate college students (e.g., Damian & Bowers, 2003; Frost & Katz, 1989; Frost, Repp, & Katz, 1988; Seidenberg & Tanenhaus, 1979; Taft & Hambly, 1985).”
WordGen: A tool for word selection and nonword generation in Dutch, English, German, and French (2004, background): “Interestingly, orthography not only influences visual word recognition processes, but has also been shown to play an important role in speech production (e.g., Damian & Bowers, 2003 ) and speech perception (e.g., Miller & Swick, 2003; Slowiaczek, Soltano, Wieting, & Bishop, 2003).”
Phonological features and phonotactic constraints in speech production (2004, background): “2 Damian & Bowers (2003) demonstrated that the form-overlap advantage can be disrupted by pure orthographic differences between items (e.g., camel, kidney showed no form-overlap advantage despite having the same initial phoneme).”
Age-related effects on speech production: A review (2006, background): “Indeed, there was a tendency for the older adults to name homophone-primed pictures more slowly than unprimed pictures (see Wheeldon & Monsell, 1992, and Damian & Bowers, 2003, for effects of orthographic relatedness between primes and targets on the speed of word production).”
Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech (2006, background): “A set of recent monolingual production studies has demonstrated that orthography may be active during production (e.g. Damian and Bowers, 2003; Osborne, Rastle and Burke, 2004).”