Phonological features and phonotactic constraints in speech production

By Matthew A. Goldrick. 2004

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/167e9ec9967b4f81f6f72e14de96c1d6762ffe1a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Kuniko Y. Nielsen

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Kuniko Y. Nielsen

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Kuniko Y. Nielsen

Citations in the corpus

• Specificity and abstractness of VOT imitation (2011, background): “Although previous studies have indicated the role of sub-phonemic representation in perceptual and phonotactic learning experiments (Goldrick, 2004; Kraljic & Samuel, 2006), relatively little was known about its production counterpart, except for the previous work on speech errors which shows both s”
• Motor movement matters: The flexible abstractness of inner speech (2010, unknown): “It is well known that speech errors are strongly affected by shared features (e.g., Goldrick, 2004; MacKay, 1970), and hence, the absence of an effect of shared features on the inner speech errors suggests that inner speech involves phonemic but not subphonemic (e.g., articulatory ) representations.”